- Our constructive outlook for emerging markets (EM) implies strengthening fundamentals for EM hard currency issuers. Supported by our bearish USD view, this suggests improving ability to service sovereign USD debt and lower refinancing risks.
- While fiscal risk and macro vulnerabilities do exists for EM issuers, our findings show that risk should be relatively low and manageable moving forward. EM credit default swap index and sovereign credit ratings, are also pointing to a declining default probability as well as a moderating ratings downgrade trend.
- EM hard currency debt still provides attractive yield pickup over both investment grade and high-yield peers. We also see further scope for spread tightening and spread suggests a decent annualised return of 6.4% over the next 2 years.
- The main challenge will likely come from EM hard currency debt’s stiff valuation and relatively higher duration risk. As such, have dialed back our initial optimism, but hold a cautiously optimistic view on the asset’s outlook. We believe EM hard currency may still offer tactical upside from further spread tightening and yield pickup.
Chart 1: Country exposure for EM hard currency debt

Robust macro outlook lowers credit risk
Chart 2: EM GDP growth forecasted to rebound above 10-year average

Fiscal risk and out-of-control external debt?
- Most issuers possess an external debt ratio that is around the global EM average, which is also less than DM average (chart 3.1).
- About 35% of the issuers have higher FOREX reserves than external debt, generally indicative of less macro vulnerabilities (chart 3.1).
- Those 'higher risk' with FOREX reserves less than external debt – Bahrain, Chile, Egypt and Ukraine – comprised only 11% of the EM hard currency universe. Even so, the outlook of Bahrain, Egypt and Ukraine were rated stable by all 3 credit rating agencies (Moody’s, Fitch, S&P) (chart 3.1).
- Budget deficit (% of GDP) is projected to decline across most issuers this year, a sign of improving public finances (chart 3.2).
Chart 3.1: Assessing riskiness via external debt and foreign exchange reserves
Chart 3.2: Assessing riskiness via budget deficit forecast
Chart 4: Credit default swap index for EM back to pre-Covid level and implying low probability of default

Chart 5: Trend in sovereign credit rating downgrades is fading
Decent yield pickup vs IG and HY sectors
Chart 6: Decent yield pickup from EM hard currency debt
Decent long-term return prospects
Chart 7: Return potential for spread of 300 - 400 bps still higher than 10-year annualized return

Key challenges moving forward – Stiff valuation and interest rate risk
Chart 8: Spread is below historical average (Z-score of -0.3) – valuation increasingly expensive
Cautiously optimistic view moving ahead
Table 1: Recommended products
|
Unit Trust |
ETF |
|
|
EM Hard Currency |
Neuberger Berman Emerging Market Debt Hard Currency A MDis SGD-H |
The Research Team is part of iFAST Financial Pte Ltd.
All materials and contents found in this site are strictly for general circulation and informational purposes only and should not be considered as an offer, or solicitation, to deal in any of the funds or products found/identified in this site. While iFAST Financial Pte Ltd ("IFPL") has tried to provide accurate and timely information, there may be inadvertent delays, omissions, technical or factual inaccuracies and typographical errors. Any opinion or estimate contained in this report is made on a general basis and neither IFPL nor any of its servants or agents have given any consideration to nor have they or any of them made any investigation of the investment objective, financial situation or particular need of any user or reader, any specific person or group of persons. You should consider carefully if the products you are going to purchase are suitable for your investment objective, investment experience, risk tolerance and other personal circumstances. If you are uncertain about the suitability of the investment product, please seek advice from a financial adviser, before making a decision to purchase the investment product. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The value of the investment products and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. In respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with the said research analyses or research reports, recipients of the report are to contact IFPL at 10 Collyer Quay, #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Building, Singapore 049315, or by telephone at +65 6557 2853. Where the report contains research analyses or research reports from a foreign research house and if the recipient of such research analyses or research reports is not an accredited investor, expert investor, institutional investor or an ex-accredited investor, IFPL accepts legal responsibility for the contents of such analyses or reports to such persons only to the extent as required by law. Please note that only certain security(ies) herein are available to all investors, while the rest are only available for certain persons to invest in, such as Accredited Investors (as defined in the Securities and Futures Act) or one who invests at least S$200,000 (or its equivalent currency) per transaction. To qualify as an Accredited Investor, one needs to submit a declaration form and certain relevant supporting documents, according to iFAST’s prevailing policies and procedures.
Please read our full disclaimers on the website at ( https://secure.fundsupermart.com/fsmone/policies/328125/investment-account-terms-&-conditions).
iFAST Financial Pte Ltd (IFPL) (registered address: 10 Collyer Quay #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Singapore 049315, Telephone: 6557 2000) holds the Financial Advisers Licence issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore ('MAS') to conduct regulated activities of advising on securities, marketing of collective investment schemes and arranging of any contract of insurance in respect of life policies, other than a contract of reinsurance and the Capital Markets Services Licence issued by the MAS to conduct regulated activities of dealing in securities and providing custodial services for securities. While IFPL has made every effort to ensure the independence of the report's contents, IFPL's nature of business is such that IFPL and its connected and associated entities together with their respective directors, officers and staff may be involved in providing dealing or investment-related services in the abovementioned securities, and have taken or may take positions in the securities mentioned in this report, and may also act as the principal for any buy or sell trades.
