- Tencent’s revenue miss was mainly due to Chinese New Year timing effects, while its core business remains highly profitable. Operating profit excluding new AI initiatives rose 17% year-on-year.
- Tencent’s AI initiatives, including Hunyuan 3.0, WorkBuddy, and CodeBuddy, helped drive 20% YoY advertising growth by improving ad targeting and monetisation efficiency.
- Alibaba’s headline weakness was distorted by divestitures and accounting changes.
- Alibaba is aggressively investing in AI infrastructure, cloud computing, AI agents, and quick commerce, resulting in weaker profits and negative free cash flow in the near term.
- Investors are increasingly rewarding companies that can demonstrate tangible AI monetisation and scalable cloud demand, signalling a shift in market valuation frameworks across China’s technology sector.
On 13 May 2026, the Hang Seng TECH Index staged a counter-intuitive rally. Despite both Tencent Holdings and Alibaba Group reporting quarterly revenues below consensus expectations, their US-listed shares surged. Tencent’s ADR rose 4.8%, while Alibaba’s ADS climbed around 8.3%.
The market reaction highlights a major shift in investor focus. Rather than penalising short-term revenue misses, investors are increasingly valuing companies based on their ability to monetise AI, scale cloud businesses, and strengthen long-term competitive positioning. In other words, the market is no longer asking only “Did revenue beat expectations this quarter?” — it is asking “Who is building the strongest AI ecosystem for the next five years?”
Tencent: Investors looked beyond the revenue miss
Tencent’s revenue came in around 1.3% below the market’s CNY 199 billion expectations (Table 1). However, the miss was largely driven by timing effects related to the Chinese New Year holiday. As the holiday fell later in 2026 compared with 2025, spending related to major games such as Honor of Kings and Peacekeeper Elite shifted into the second quarter. This delayed part of the seasonal in-app purchase cycle beyond the March quarter-end.
More importantly, Tencent’s international gaming business remained strong. Overseas gaming revenue rose 13% year-on-year, supported by titles such as Clash Royale, Wuthering Waves, and VALORANT. This suggests that Tencent’s core gaming franchises remain healthy despite temporary domestic seasonality.
Beneath the headline revenue miss, Tencent’s underlying business remains highly profitable. Operating profit excluding new AI initiatives rose 17% year-on-year to CNY 84.4 billion, while margins expanded from 39.9% to 43.0%. This provided reassurance that Tencent’s traditional businesses, gaming, social platforms, fintech, and advertising, continue to generate strong growth organically.
Table 1: Tencent’s FY1Q26 financial results
|
Metrics |
1Q25 (Billion CNY) |
1Q26 (Billion CNY) |
YoY Change |
Consensus |
|
Total revenue |
180.0 |
196.5 |
9% |
Miss estimates of around CNY 199 billion |
|
Value added services |
92.1 |
96.1 |
4% |
|
|
Marketing services |
31.9 |
38.2 |
20% |
|
|
FinTech and Business Services |
54.9 |
59.9 |
9% |
|
|
Others |
1.1 |
2.3 |
103% |
|
|
Gross Profit |
100.3 |
111.3 |
11% |
|
|
Non-IFRS operating profit |
62.9 |
69.8 |
11% |
Beat |
|
Non-IFRS operating profit excl AI |
72.1 |
84.4 |
17% |
Beat |
|
Non-IFRS operating margin excl AI |
39.9% |
43.0% |
+310 bps |
|
|
Non-IFRS net Profit |
62.9 |
69.8 |
11% |
Beat |
|
Diluted EPS (IFRS) |
5.1 |
6.3 |
23% |
Beat |
|
Source: Tencent’s earnings presentations. Data as of 31 March 2026. |
||||
AI is already improving monetisation
The strongest part of Tencent’s results was advertising. Marketing services revenue grew 20% year-on-year. The improvement was driven by upgrades to Tencent’s Hunyuan 3.0 large language model and the rollout of AI agents across the WeChat ecosystem. These include WorkBuddy which focuses on enterprise productivity and CodeBuddy which focuses on coding and software development. These AI tools improved advertisement targeting accuracy and click-through rates, helping advertisers achieve better returns on spending. Investors viewed this as direct evidence that Tencent’s AI investments are beginning to translate into real commercial returns.
On the model front, Hunyuan 3.0 has gained notable international traction as one of the most widely used models on the OpenRouter platform by token consumption following the end of its free trial on 8 May 2026. For a company that entered large-scale AI model competition as a relative latecomer, this marks a meaningful strategic milestone.
At the same time, Tencent is increasing AI investment. The management plans to spend more than CNY 36 billion on AI in 2026, double the CNY 18 billion invested in 2025. Tencent’s balance sheet remains exceptionally strong. Net cash of CNY 146.9 billion (up 63% year-on-year) and free cash flow of CNY 56.7 billion (up 20%) give the company full internal firepower for its AI ambitions without dilution or stress.
Alibaba: Weak earnings, but strong AI conviction
Alibaba’s results looked far more concerning than Tencent’s. Revenue missed expectations, while non-GAAP net profit declined nearly 100% (Table 2). However, investors quickly focused on the underlying drivers, and particularly on Alibaba’s accelerating AI and cloud momentum.
Table 2: Alibaba’s FY4Q26 financial earnings
|
Metrics |
FY4Q25 (Billion CNY) |
FY 4Q26 (Billion CNY) |
YoY Change |
Consensus |
|
Total revenue |
236.5 |
243.4 |
3% |
Miss estimates of ~CNY 247 billion |
|
China e-commerce group |
115.3 |
122.2 |
6% |
|
|
International Digital Commerce |
33.6 |
35.4 |
6% |
|
|
Cloud intelligence |
30.1 |
41.6 |
38% |
|
|
Others |
83.3 |
65.5 |
-21% |
|
|
Gross Profit |
90.9 |
84.0 |
-8% |
|
|
GAAP net income |
12.0 |
23.5 |
96% |
Beat |
|
Non-GAAP net income |
29.8 |
0.086 |
-100% |
Deep miss |
|
Non-GAAP diluted EPS |
12.52 |
0.62 |
-95% |
Deep miss |
|
Source: Alibaba’s earnings presentations. Data as of 31 March 2026. |
||||
Why the revenue missed: A divestiture distortion
Alibaba’s headline revenue miss was primarily caused by divestitures rather than deteriorating core demand. Businesses such as Sun Art and Intime, which contributed meaningfully to last year’s revenue base, were disposed during FY2026. Excluding these divested operations, Alibaba’s revenue would have grown roughly 11% year-on-year on a like-for-like basis.
Similarly, customer management revenue (CMR) growth appeared weak at only 1% YoY. However, this was distorted by an accounting change. Under Alibaba’s new merchant support programme, platform subsidies are now recorded as contra-revenue instead of marketing expenses. Adjusting for this reclassification, underlying CMR growth was closer to 8%.
Alibaba is sacrificing profits to build AI scale
The main reason profits weakened was aggressive investment spending. Total quarterly costs and expenses rose 17.5% year-on-year to CNY244.3 billion, far outpacing revenue growth. Two major investment areas drove this increase (Table 3):
- Quick Commerce expansion. Alibaba is investing heavily into Taobao Instant Commerce to compete in China’s rapidly growing quick-delivery market. China commerce adjusted EBITA fell 40% to CNY 24 billion as the company absorbed substantial subsidies and fulfilment costs. However, revenue from the segment surged 57% year-on-year to nearly CNY20 billion. Management also indicated that unit economics turned positive earlier in 2026, supported by improving order mix and higher-value categories. Losses are expected to narrow progressively through the second half of 2026.
- AI ecosystem buildout. Alibaba is also spending aggressively to scale the Qwen AI ecosystem. The “All Others” segment recorded adjusted EBITA losses of CNY 21.2 billion, compared with losses of CNY 3.4 billion a year earlier. The sharp deterioration mainly reflected higher user acquisition spending for the Qwen AI app and expansion of AI-related infrastructure. During the quarter, Alibaba integrated Taobao and Tmall into Qwen, creating an AI-native shopping experience.
Table 3: Alibaba’s FY4Q26 adjusted EBITA by segment
|
Segment |
Q4 FY2025 (Billion CNY) |
Q4 FY2026 (Billion CNY) |
YoY Change |
Comments |
|
China E-commerce |
39.7 |
24.0 |
-40% |
Quick commerce subsidies |
|
AIDC (International) |
-3.6 |
-0.1 |
96% |
Approaching breakeven |
|
Cloud Intelligence Group |
2.4 |
3.8 |
57% |
Revenue + efficiency improvements |
|
All Others |
-3.4 |
-21.2 |
-520% |
Qwen app user acquisition |
|
Consolidated |
32.6 |
5.1 |
-84% |
|
|
Source: Alibaba’s earnings presentations. Data as of 31 March 2026. |
||||
Cloud and AI are becoming the core investment story
The strongest part of Alibaba’s results was unquestionably cloud computing. AI-related revenue now contributes around 30% of Alibaba Cloud’s external revenue, up from low single-digit percentages two years ago. CEO Eddie Wu guided that annualised recurring revenue from AI model and application services could exceed CNY10 billion in the June quarter and CNY30 billion by December 2026. This implies potential tripling within months. Management also expects AI-related revenue to exceed 50% of cloud external revenue within one year.
Alibaba currently possesses one of China’s most vertically integrated AI ecosystems, spanning proprietary foundation models (Qwen), cloud infrastructure and self-designed inference chips (T-Head Zhenwu PPUs). More than 100,000 of these chips have reportedly been deployed within Alibaba Cloud, while over 30 automakers are using them for intelligent driving R&D. This full-stack capability is becoming increasingly valuable under ongoing US export restrictions on advanced semiconductors.
The downside is clear: AI expansion is extremely capital intensive. Alibaba’s free cash flow swung from positive CNY 73.9 billion to negative CNY 46.6 billion in FY2026. Total capital expenditure reached CNY 126.1 billion, up 36.8% year-on-year, as Alibaba accelerated investment into AI training infrastructure, inferencing facilities and global data centre expansion. The management remains committed to investing CNY 380 billion over the next three years into AI infrastructure and cloud development.
While this creates near-term earnings and cash flow pressure, Alibaba believes these investments are necessary to secure long-term AI leadership. Importantly, the company still maintains roughly CNY 520 billion in net cash, giving it substantial financial capacity to continue investing.
The market is repricing the Chinese internet companies
The most important takeaway from both Tencent and Alibaba’s results is that investors are increasingly focused on the quality and composition of growth rather than headline revenue figures alone. What matters now is the sustainability of AI monetisation and the credibility of the long-term growth infrastructure being built beneath the headline numbers.
Tencent and Alibaba are approaching this opportunity differently. Tencent is converting AI investment into near-term monetisation. Advertising revenue growing 20% year-on-year is real, measurable evidence of that. Alibaba, by contrast, is taking a longer-term approach, accepting near-term pressure on earnings and cash flow in exchange for what could become structural leadership in AI and cloud computing.
Both strategies reinforce the broader investment case for Chinese technology companies. AI is no longer purely a conceptual growth theme, it is increasingly showing up in monetisation, infrastructure spending, and ecosystem expansion. As such, we continue to see attractive long-term opportunities within the Chinese technology sector.
Based on our estimates, the HSTECH Index could reach HKD 7,760 by FY2028, implying approximately 53% upside from current levels. This would translate into an indicative level of HKD 16.3 for the iShares Hang Seng Tech ETF (HKEX: 3067) and SGD 1.2 for the Lion-OCBC Securities Hang Seng Tech ETF (SGX: HST).
Table 4: Projections for the Hang Seng Tech Index
|
|
2025 |
2026E |
2027E |
2028E |
|
PE Ratio (X) |
20.2 |
18.8 |
16.5 |
14.7 |
|
Earnings Growth (YoY%) |
4.7% |
7.6% |
13.8% |
12.1% |
|
EPS |
251.3 |
270.4 |
307.8 |
345.0 |
|
Dividend Yield |
1.1% |
1.2% |
1.2% |
1.3% |
|
Projected Fair Price (HKD) |
|
7,762 |
||
|
Upside (Based on fair PE ratio of 22.5X) |
|
52.9% |
||
|
Source: Bloomberg
Finance L.P., iFAST estimates |
||||
Figure 1: Share price vs. EPS chart for Hang Seng Tech Index

Declaration:
This research report was prepared with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools. iFAST Financial Pte Ltd does not rely exclusively on AI for content generation; the content of this report – including all investment theses, ratings, price targets and conclusions – has been independently reviewed and verified by the research analyst(s) to ensure accuracy and professional integrity.
For specific disclosure, at the time of publication of this report, IFPL (via its connected and associated entities) hold a NIL position in the abovementioned securities. The analyst who produced this report hold iShares Hang Seng Tech ETF (HKEX: 3067).
All materials and contents found in this site are strictly for general circulation and informational purposes only and should not be considered as an offer, or solicitation, to deal in any of the funds or products found/identified in this site. While iFAST Financial Pte Ltd ("IFPL") has tried to provide accurate and timely information, there may be inadvertent delays, omissions, technical or factual inaccuracies and typographical errors. Any opinion or estimate contained in this report is made on a general basis and neither IFPL nor any of its servants or agents have given any consideration to nor have they or any of them made any investigation of the investment objective, financial situation or particular need of any user or reader, any specific person or group of persons. You should consider carefully if the products you are going to purchase are suitable for your investment objective, investment experience, risk tolerance and other personal circumstances. If you are uncertain about the suitability of the investment product, please seek advice from a financial adviser, before making a decision to purchase the investment product. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The value of the investment products and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. In respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with the said research analyses or research reports, recipients of the report are to contact IFPL at 10 Collyer Quay, #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Building, Singapore 049315, or by telephone at +65 6557 2853. Where the report contains research analyses or research reports from a foreign research house and if the recipient of such research analyses or research reports is not an accredited investor, expert investor, institutional investor or an ex-accredited investor, IFPL accepts legal responsibility for the contents of such analyses or reports to such persons only to the extent as required by law. Please note that only certain security(ies) herein are available to all investors, while the rest are only available for certain persons to invest in, such as Accredited Investors (as defined in the Securities and Futures Act) or one who invests at least S$200,000 (or its equivalent currency) per transaction. To qualify as an Accredited Investor, one needs to submit a declaration form and certain relevant supporting documents, according to iFAST’s prevailing policies and procedures.
Please read our full disclaimers on the website at ( https://secure.fundsupermart.com/fsmone/policies/328125/investment-account-terms-&-conditions).
iFAST Financial Pte Ltd (IFPL) (registered address: 10 Collyer Quay #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Singapore 049315, Telephone: 6557 2000) holds the Financial Advisers Licence issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore ('MAS') to conduct regulated activities of advising on securities, marketing of collective investment schemes and arranging of any contract of insurance in respect of life policies, other than a contract of reinsurance and the Capital Markets Services Licence issued by the MAS to conduct regulated activities of dealing in securities and providing custodial services for securities. While IFPL has made every effort to ensure the independence of the report's contents, IFPL's nature of business is such that IFPL and its connected and associated entities together with their respective directors, officers and staff may be involved in providing dealing or investment-related services in the abovementioned securities, and have taken or may take positions in the securities mentioned in this report, and may also act as the principal for any buy or sell trades.
