Macro Research

Is the 30% rebound in Asian high yield sustainable? We believe not.

We maintain our defensive stance on Asian high yield bonds, as the actual pace of recovery in China’s housing market could trail high expectations of a short-term rebound.

  • |
  • Published on 08 Mar 2023

Is the 30% rebound in Asian high yield sustainable? We believe not. | Open a FREE FSMOne account and manage all your investments conveniently in ONE place
Photo by Bruce on Unsplash

  • Property demand remains fragile despite the string of supportive policy measures and the reopening from Covid-19 curbs.
  • With China’s housing market yet to find a stable footing, a short-term rebound does not seem plausible at the current juncture.
  • Developers have continued to experience rating downgrades or defaults on their debt obligations in recent times, showing the limitations of government intervention.
  • We believe that the market is likely running ahead of itself, painting an extremely optimistic scenario that everything could quickly come under control.
  • We maintain our defensive stance on Asian high yield bonds and recommend investors to gradually reduce their positions.


With China unleashing a wave of supportive policies for the property sector alongside the reopening of its economy from Covid-19 curbs, Asian high yield bonds – as measured by the Bloomberg Asia USD High Yield Bond Index – have surged by around 30% since November 2022 (Figure 1).

However, in our opinion, the rally is likely to be short-lived. We maintain our defensive stance on Asian high yield bonds, and outline our rationale below.

Figure 1: Asian high yield has since rallied sharply


(Related article: Downgrading Asian high yield: Why we aren’t taking this risky bet anymore)


Property demand remains fragile

The first shot in the arm for the property sector came from the banking regulator and the central bank on 11 November 2022. They announced 16 measures designed to relieve the credit crunch in the property sector, and ensure developers complete and deliver presold homes. Furthermore, recent market headlines suggest that China is considering relaxing its stringent “three red lines” policy for some developers, representing a significant policy shift in the sector. All these are sending signals that China’s crackdown on the property sector may finally be over.

In our view, the shift in policy tone does not mean that the deepest problems in China’s property sector are gone too. The string of supportive policy measures and the reopening from Covid-19 curbs have failed to restore confidence in the housing market. Where it stands, property demand remains fragile.

China’s reopening comes at a time when external demand is weakening as the global economy heads towards a slowdown. This poses risks to China’s economic prospects, consequently affecting prospective homebuyers’ financial situation and their willingness to purchase big-ticket items amidst the uncertainties.

Besides, homebuyers have continued concerns over the developers’ ability to deliver homes that have been pre-sold. It will take time for developers to finish the uncompleted projects, especially if the developers themselves first need to be restructured. Take Evergrande for example: A year on since defaulting on its debts, the Group is still trying to work out a restructuring plan. Also, we think that there needs to be a steady stream of completions in order to meaningfully restore confidence in the housing market.


Don’t expect a short-term rebound

On top of that, property indicators suggest the sector has not bottomed out yet. New home prices in 70 Chinese cities surveyed by the National Bureau of Statistics are experiencing an extended period of year-on-year declines (Figure 2). While new home prices in January 2023 were up 0.1% month-on-month versus a 0.2% slide in December 2022, we note that one positive data point does not make a trend. In our view, the confidence crisis is creating a vicious cycle, in which homebuyers are holding themselves back from entering the market, waiting for prices to fall further.

Figure 2: Home prices have been falling persistently


On the supply side, as developers struggle to sell homes, inventory has been piling up. Home inventory, measured in terms of gross floor area, is near a five-year high, after a strong 10.5% surge year-on-year in 2022 (Figure 3). Inventory de-stocking through price cuts could weigh on China’s home prices. As such, property inventory – which has become excessive – needs to unwind in an orderly manner, or else the sector could risk having a systemic crisis.

Figure 3: Inventory has been piling up


While China is trying to manage the oversupply of homes and limiting price declines in some areas (where developers have been blocked from slashing prices by more than 15%), we think it is still too early to conclude that a ‘soft landing’ in the housing market can be engineered. Ultimately, it is dependent on whether confidence could be restored successfully before it becomes too late.

By and large, we are keeping a wary eye on the recovery story. China’s housing market has yet to find a stable footing, suggesting that a short-term rebound does not seem plausible at the current juncture. The government, perhaps, has to do more. Policy impact will also take time to materialise, meaning that the housing market’s recovery should be gradual and potentially bumpy.


Default risk remains persistent

Furthermore, we have continued to see developers experiencing rating downgrades or defaults on their debt obligations in recent times, showing the limitations of the plethora of government attempts to ease the liquidity crunch in the property sector. Notably, Times China – China’s 51st largest developer by contracted sales in 2022 – defaulted on two US dollar (USD) bonds in January 2023 and is halting payments on offshore notes.

Could the last wave of downgrades or defaults in China’s property bond market be over? The short answer is: unlikely.

For a start, financing tools that have been recently revived by the Chinese government, as termed by the “three arrows” (i.e. bank loan, bond issuance, equity finance), are unlikely to benefit every developer. Only developers – both state-owned and private-owned – that have been classified as ‘good quality’ by the government are expected to receive broader support. Meanwhile, others are likely to be left behind.

Beyond this, contracted sales – a key driver of developers’ liquidity profiles – are in the doldrums. The nation’s top 100 developers are already experiencing a long period of pain with double-digit sales decline year-on-year (Figure 4). While sales in February rose, the rebound may not be sustainable as China’s housing market yet to find a stable footing.

Figure 4: Sales of top 100 developers consistently face double-digits negative growth


Furthermore, land purchases plummeted by over 50% year-on-year (Figure 5). We believe that this is a sign of not only weak sentiment among developers, but also tight liquidity. With developers reluctant or lacking the ability to buy land for new buildings, contracted sales growth is expected to remain subdued moving forward, resulting in the potential for deterioration of liquidity.

Figure 5: Land sales have slumped


In the near term, China’s property bond market continues to face a challenging hurdle of offshore bond maturities. Out of these, Country Garden stands out as a big-name (Figure 6). Despite the recent repayment of its January 2023 bonds, the unclear industry outlook and the Group's large scale suggest that the impact of new policies and rescue measures might have their limitations. We also keep in mind that Country Garden’s focus is on China’s more challenging tier-3 and tier-4 cities.

Figure 6: Country Garden has a relatively larger amount of debt due


The longer term outlook of property developers is also bleak. China’s shift to a top-downed state-controlled economy is expected to threaten the long-term profitability of private developers. At the annual National People’s Congress, authorities have also remarked that they will remain tough on the sector – we believe policy is unlikely to be relaxed by a huge extent.

Additionally, the unfinished homes and falling home prices have spooked some potential homebuyers, who now see no point in owning property and would rather rent. China has plans for those looking to rent – it aims to build 6.5 million public rental housing in 40 cities by 2025.


The Asian high yield bond market is likely running ahead of itself

From the perspective of valuations, there has been a broad and fairly indiscriminate recovery in China’s property bonds. Despite poor property indicators and the lack of substantial recovery in liquidity profiles of developers, the percentage of Chinese property bonds trading above 50 cents on the dollar (in the Bloomberg Asia USD High Yield Bond Index) has increased dramatically to 76% at the time of writing. As at end-October, which was the peak of the sell-off, the percentage stood at just 9% (Figure 7).

Figure 7: A broad and fairly indiscriminate recovery


Meanwhile, Asian high yield credit spreads have narrowed by nearly half since November 2022, and are now returning to levels seen during the early days of the Evergrande crisis, one that was initially thought to remain as an idiosyncratic event – but we all know how that turned out.

Figure 8: Spreads have narrowed significantly from the peak


Overall, we believe that the market is likely running ahead of itself, painting an extremely optimistic scenario in which risks are dissipating rapidly and everything could quickly come under control. In reality, while the worst may be over, conditions in China’s property sector do not seem to be going all the way back to where it was before.

There are still lingering problems in the housing market, implying a long road ahead to reach a meaningful recovery. As the confidence crisis continues to be detrimental to housing prices and contracted sales, the actual pace of recovery could trail high expectations of a short-term rebound. Once the market realises that, the rally should run out of legs and correct itself.


Investors should redeploy their capital elsewhere

Given our view of the recent sharp rebound being unsustainable, we maintain our defensive stance on Asian high yield bonds. Now would be an opportune time for investors to gradually cut their positions. For investors who do not have any positions in the Asian high yield bond market, we recommend them to stay clear.

In our view, compelling investment opportunities – which are backed by solid fundamentals – can be found elsewhere for fixed income. Amidst the global macroeconomic uncertainties, we opt to stay defensive, with a preference for high-quality, short duration bonds.

Table 1: Recommended products

Market / Sector

Recommended Product

Global Bonds

Allianz Global Opportunistic Bond Cl AMg Dis H2-SGD

Short Duration Bonds

Nikko AM Shenton Short Term Bond SGD

United SGD Fund Cl A Acc SGD

LionGlobal Short Duration Bond Cl A Dis SGD

Related articles:

Check out these bond funds included in CPFIS that can potentially offer higher yields than T-bills

An unconstrained bond strategy really shines during market uncertainties

All materials and contents found in this site are strictly for general circulation and informational purposes only and should not be considered as an offer, or solicitation, to deal in any of the funds or products found/identified in this site. While iFAST Financial Pte Ltd ("IFPL") has tried to provide accurate and timely information, there may be inadvertent delays, omissions, technical or factual inaccuracies and typographical errors. Any opinion or estimate contained in this report is made on a general basis and neither IFPL nor any of its servants or agents have given any consideration to nor have they or any of them made any investigation of the investment objective, financial situation or particular need of any user or reader, any specific person or group of persons. You should consider carefully if the products you are going to purchase are suitable for your investment objective, investment experience, risk tolerance and other personal circumstances. If you are uncertain about the suitability of the investment product, please seek advice from a financial adviser, before making a decision to purchase the investment product. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The value of the investment products and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. In respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with the said research analyses or research reports, recipients of the report are to contact IFPL at 10 Collyer Quay, #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Building, Singapore 049315, or by telephone at +65 6557 2853. Where the report contains research analyses or research reports from a foreign research house and if the recipient of such research analyses or research reports is not an accredited investor, expert investor, institutional investor or an ex-accredited investor, IFPL accepts legal responsibility for the contents of such analyses or reports to such persons only to the extent as required by law. Please note that only certain security(ies) herein are available to all investors, while the rest are only available for certain persons to invest in, such as Accredited Investors (as defined in the Securities and Futures Act) or one who invests at least S$200,000 (or its equivalent currency) per transaction. To qualify as an Accredited Investor, one needs to submit a declaration form and certain relevant supporting documents, according to iFAST’s prevailing policies and procedures.

Please read our full disclaimers on the website at ( https://secure.fundsupermart.com/fsmone/policies/328125/investment-account-terms-&-conditions).

iFAST Financial Pte Ltd (IFPL) (registered address: 10 Collyer Quay #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Singapore 049315, Telephone: 6557 2000) holds the Financial Advisers Licence issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore ('MAS') to conduct regulated activities of advising on securities, marketing of collective investment schemes and arranging of any contract of insurance in respect of life policies, other than a contract of reinsurance and the Capital Markets Services Licence issued by the MAS to conduct regulated activities of dealing in securities and providing custodial services for securities. While IFPL has made every effort to ensure the independence of the report's contents, IFPL's nature of business is such that IFPL and its connected and associated entities together with their respective directors, officers and staff may be involved in providing dealing or investment-related services in the abovementioned securities, and have taken or may take positions in the securities mentioned in this report, and may also act as the principal for any buy or sell trades.

Ways to Invest with FSM Global
Why FSM Global
Don't have an account with us?
Open an account here
Need Financial Advice?
Make an appointment

We use cookies If you close this message or continue to use this site, you will consent to the use of Cookies, unless you choose to disable them. Click on our Privacy Policy to understand more.