• The performance of high-quality companies in the long run cannot be understated. Over the past two decades, high-quality companies have outperformed the broader market by a significant margin.
• High-quality companies tend to experience much smaller earnings per share (EPS) declines relative to other companies. They are also less likely to see drastic negative revisions to EPS estimates, which can help to support valuations.
• High-quality companies have also proven to have a lower maximum drawdown even during recessions.
• The current macro backdrop remains supportive of quality. Higher-for-longer inflation and interest rates are pushing the US economy to the brink of a recession. These are times when exposure to high-quality companies may be beneficial to investors’ portfolios.
• Investors can add exposure to the quality factor via the JPMorgan US Quality Factor ETF (NYSE:JQUA).
Amidst the market volatility over the past few months, the quality factor has continued to perform well. Over the past three months, the MSCI USA Quality Index managed to deliver returns of 7.06%, whereas the MSCI USA Growth Index and the MSCI USA Index had returns of -2.69% and 4.91% respectively (Table 1). As a matter of fact, the quality factor has also managed to deliver strong performance over the long term, having outperformed the broader equity market and even the growth factor by a significant margin over the past two decades (Figure 1).
Table 1: Quality stocks have held up well amidst the market downturn this year
|
3-month |
6-month |
Year-to-date |
|
|
MSCI USA Quality Index |
7.06% |
0.10% |
-23.19% |
|
MSCI USA Growth Index |
-2.69% |
-4.95% |
-32.67% |
|
MSCI USA Index |
4.91% |
0.46% |
-20.10% |
|
Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P. Total Returns in USD terms, Data as of 27 Dec 2022 |
|||
Figure 1: Quality has outperformed the broader equity market over the past two decades.

Aside from the well-known duo of value and growth, quality is another widely used investing style, especially during periods of high market volatility. It can be defined as buying companies with durable long-term profitability, minimal solvency and financial risk, and high earnings quality. Quality can also be described as "defensive", given that it is typically more resilient during times of market stress, especially during the later phase of the economic cycle (such as now).
(Related Article: A global recession is likely unavoidable in 2023. Here’s how you can prepare for it.)
Given our view that the US economy is headed for a recession in 2023, we believe that investors will be rewarded for taking on more exposure to the quality factor. In this article we lay out the reasons why, and also share our recommended ETF for exposure to US quality stocks.
(Related Article: Navigate the US market turbulence with a Quality-focused strategy)
Companies with high-quality earnings tend to outperform during times of economic stress
There are a number of reasons why quality stocks tend to outperform growth stocks or even the broader market during times of economic stress, and it all boils down to how these stocks are selected. For instance, the MSCI USA Quality Index aims to identify high-quality US stocks based on three fundamental variables, namely, high return on equity, low debt-to-equity, and low earnings variability (Figure 2).
In the end, companies that are included within the index exhibit the strongest of these characteristics relative to their peers. The top 10 holdings include the likes of Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), Visa (NYSE:V), and Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), all of which have demonstrated consistent earnings power over time and are market leaders in their respective industries.
Figure 2: The MSCI USA Quality Index screens for quality stocks using these three metrics

Source: MSCI
Based on this screening methodology, it is obvious that a lot of emphasis has been placed on profitability and earnings quality, with two out of the three metrics taking this into account. This is important because share prices are ultimately driven by earnings growth in the long run. Companies with more sustainable earnings growth tend to see share prices appreciate in the long term.
Looking back in time, we can see very clearly that companies with high-quality earnings tend to experience much smaller declines relative to other companies. For instance, during the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic back in 2020 and the current high inflation, high interest rate environment, the trailing 12-month earnings growth of quality stocks has declined by a much smaller magnitude relative to the broader market (Figure 3). Aside from this, high-quality companies are also less likely to see drastic negative revisions to earnings per share (EPS) estimates, which can help to support valuations.
Figure 3: Earnings growth of high-quality companies tends to experience smaller declines relative to the broader market

These companies typically have robust balance sheets and are thus better positioned to withstand economic downturns. Many of them also possess competitive advantages and pricing power, allowing them to pass higher input costs to consumers without suffering a substantial loss in demand (due to factors like demand inelasticity, brand power, and industry dominance), thus protecting their margins and earnings.
Visa, for instance, operates on a massive scale and is deeply entrenched within the global financial system. That has allowed it to grow its EPS by a mind-blowing compound annual growth rate of nearly 30% over the past 10 years, in addition to its industry-leading profit margins.
Aside from their resilient share price performance, the defensive nature of high-quality companies can also be observed from metrics such as their maximum drawdown. As seen from Figure 4, the MSCI USA Quality Index has a lower maximum drawdown than the broader market during times of economic stress, such as the dot-com bubble in 2001, the global financial crisis in 2008, and the Covid-induced recession in early 2020.
Figure 4: The MSCI USA Quality Index has a lower maximum drawdown relative to the broader market during times of economic stress

The bottom line is this: based on empirical evidence, high-quality companies do indeed outperform the broader market during times of economic weakness and uncertainty. As such, increasing one’s exposure to high-quality companies may help to buffer against any potential downturns as we head towards a recession.
Current macro backdrop remains supportive of quality
Speaking of economic weakness and uncertainty, the health of the US economy has deteriorated by a great deal since the start of the year. Between the inverted yield curve, stubbornly high inflation, and a Federal Reserve that is aggressively raising rates, the US has been pushed to the brink of a recession.
As of November 2022, the US Leading Economic Index (LEI) has fallen for nine consecutive months, with the latest reading coming in at -4.5% year-on-year (Figure 5). The sustained and sharp downturn of the LEI suggests that economic conditions have deteriorated substantially, and it is just a matter of time before the US enters a recession, if it isn’t already in one.
Figure 5: US leading indicators continue to decline in October, pointing to a recession

Dissecting the numbers, November’s LEI reading was brought down mainly by weaker-than-expected consumer expectations for business conditions as high inflation and tighter monetary policy continued to bite. Looking ahead, we expect inflation to moderate as growth slows but it is unlikely to reach the Fed’s target of 2% in the foreseeable future. We believe that inflation is becoming more entrenched as the world moves into a new regime where structural forces will lead to a more persistent rise in inflation in the years ahead.
(Related Article: How long will it take for inflation to hit 2%? Hint: much longer than you think)
Among the various factors keeping inflation higher, an exceptionally tight labour market is perhaps one of the biggest culprits. In the US, there are roughly 1.7 vacancies for every person currently registered as unemployed (Figure 6). Non-farm payrolls rose by 263,000 in November, beating the median consensus forecast of 193,000 by a significant margin (Figure 7). The unemployment rate also remains low relative to historical standards.
Figure 6: Despite multiple rate hikes, the US labour market remains robust

Figure 7: Nonfarm payrolls continue to beat estimates

November’s jobs report also showed average hourly wages rising by 0.6% month-on-month – the highest since January this year – as workers continue to leverage their bargaining power amidst a tight labour market. Businesses will likely pass on the higher labour costs to consumers in the form of higher prices, adding to inflationary pressures.
A robust labour market, coupled with stubbornly high inflation, leaves the Fed no choice but to continue tightening. During the December FOMC meeting, the Fed raised rates by 50 bps, bringing the upper bound of the Fed Funds Target Rate to 4.5%. This makes the 2022 rate-tightening cycle the most aggressive since 1988. To put things into perspective, rates have gone up by 425 bps in a span of nine months, a rate of change that far exceeds previous tightening cycles (Table 2).
Table 2: The current rate-tightening cycle has been the most aggressive in recent times
|
Period |
Duration (months) |
Total Change* (bps) |
Rate of Change (bps/month) |
|
Mar 1988 - May 1989 |
14 |
323 |
23.07 |
|
Feb 1994 - Feb 1995 |
12 |
267 |
22.25 |
|
Jun 1999 - May 2000 |
11 |
151 |
13.73 |
|
Jun 2004 - Jun 2006 |
24 |
396 |
16.50 |
|
Dec 2015 - Dec 2018 |
36 |
203 |
5.64 |
|
Mar 2022 - Dec 2022 |
9 |
425 |
47.22 |
|
Source: Visual Capitalist, Federal Reserve *Based on Effective Rate Data as of Dec 2022 |
|||
With inflation still far from the Fed’s 2% target, don’t count on them to take their foot off the tightening pedal anytime soon. This brings about another problem: the Fed overtightening and causing a deep recession.
Looking at the way things are progressing, we believe that a US recession is likely unavoidable at this point. The strong earnings growth delivered by most companies post-pandemic will likely be unsustainable. High inflation and steep borrowing costs will put downward pressure on revenues and margins, leading to lower, or worse, negative earnings growth. These are times when exposure to high-quality companies may be beneficial to investors’ portfolios.
(Related Article: A global recession is likely unavoidable in 2023. Here’s how you can prepare for it.)
Looking back at previous recession years when the MSCI USA Index registered negative earnings growth, we can see very clearly that companies with strong balance sheets, high-quality earnings, and stable cash flows were still able to deliver positive EPS growth for the most part, demonstrating their resilience when times are tough (Table 3).
Table 3: Year-on-year earnings growth/decline of high-quality companies relative to the MSCI USA Index
|
2007 |
2008 |
2020 |
|
|
MSCI USA Index |
-12.83% |
-62.26% |
-27.76% |
|
Microsoft |
19.01% |
31.94% |
13.89% |
|
Visa |
N.A |
137.63% |
-7.93% |
|
Apple |
71.17% |
71.79% |
10.70% |
|
Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P. Microsoft, Visa, Apple and are the current top holdings of the MSCI USA Quality Index |
|||
All in all, in the current macro environment where high inflation and aggressive monetary tightening will likely lead to a recession, we believe that investors will benefit by incorporating some exposure to the quality factor in their portfolios. The quality factor also complements value investing, allowing investors to create a more balanced equity portfolio that can perform across a broad range of market environments. Our recommended ETF for exposure to US quality companies is the JPMorgan US Quality Factor ETF (NYSE:JQUA).
This ETF aims to provide investors with exposure to a basket of high-quality US stocks by utilising a rules-based approach that matches the sector weights of the Russell 1000 Index and selects stocks based on quality and profitability characteristics. To make things even more enticing, this ETF has the lowest expense ratio among all its peers, making it a cost-effective way for investors to get diversified exposure to a basket of quality US names.
Declaration:
For specific disclosure, at the time of publication of this report, IFPL (via its connected and associated entities) and the analyst who produced this report hold a NIL position in the abovementioned securities.
All materials and contents found in this site are strictly for general circulation and informational purposes only and should not be considered as an offer, or solicitation, to deal in any of the funds or products found/identified in this site. While iFAST Financial Pte Ltd ("IFPL") has tried to provide accurate and timely information, there may be inadvertent delays, omissions, technical or factual inaccuracies and typographical errors. Any opinion or estimate contained in this report is made on a general basis and neither IFPL nor any of its servants or agents have given any consideration to nor have they or any of them made any investigation of the investment objective, financial situation or particular need of any user or reader, any specific person or group of persons. You should consider carefully if the products you are going to purchase are suitable for your investment objective, investment experience, risk tolerance and other personal circumstances. If you are uncertain about the suitability of the investment product, please seek advice from a financial adviser, before making a decision to purchase the investment product. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The value of the investment products and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. In respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with the said research analyses or research reports, recipients of the report are to contact IFPL at 10 Collyer Quay, #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Building, Singapore 049315, or by telephone at +65 6557 2853. Where the report contains research analyses or research reports from a foreign research house and if the recipient of such research analyses or research reports is not an accredited investor, expert investor, institutional investor or an ex-accredited investor, IFPL accepts legal responsibility for the contents of such analyses or reports to such persons only to the extent as required by law. Please note that only certain security(ies) herein are available to all investors, while the rest are only available for certain persons to invest in, such as Accredited Investors (as defined in the Securities and Futures Act) or one who invests at least S$200,000 (or its equivalent currency) per transaction. To qualify as an Accredited Investor, one needs to submit a declaration form and certain relevant supporting documents, according to iFAST’s prevailing policies and procedures.
Please read our full disclaimers on the website at ( https://secure.fundsupermart.com/fsmone/policies/328125/investment-account-terms-&-conditions).
iFAST Financial Pte Ltd (IFPL) (registered address: 10 Collyer Quay #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Singapore 049315, Telephone: 6557 2000) holds the Financial Advisers Licence issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore ('MAS') to conduct regulated activities of advising on securities, marketing of collective investment schemes and arranging of any contract of insurance in respect of life policies, other than a contract of reinsurance and the Capital Markets Services Licence issued by the MAS to conduct regulated activities of dealing in securities and providing custodial services for securities. While IFPL has made every effort to ensure the independence of the report's contents, IFPL's nature of business is such that IFPL and its connected and associated entities together with their respective directors, officers and staff may be involved in providing dealing or investment-related services in the abovementioned securities, and have taken or may take positions in the securities mentioned in this report, and may also act as the principal for any buy or sell trades.
