Bonds

Can China Evergrande Bank Their Recovery on Asset Sales?

  • |
  • Published on 13 Aug 2021

Can China Evergrande Bank Their Recovery on Asset Sales? | Open a FREE FSMOne account and manage all your investments conveniently in ONE place

Receive first-hand news on the latest bond issues, credit updates and special events when you join us on our Telegram channel at https://t.me/bondsupermart!


As we write this in the morning of 13 August, Evergrande’s USD bond due March 2022 “EVERRE 8.250% 23Mar2022 Corp (USD)” is currently sitting at a level of $60, with annualized yield over 150%, after yet another week of volatility.

Last Thursday, S&P further downgraded Evergrande’s issuer rating to CCC, but that’s not the only news. 

Commercial Paper Cases are Centralized at Court

In the afternoon of 4 August, the market began circulating news that all court cases relating to Evergrande’s commercial paper would be centralized at Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court. Although related articles were quickly taken down, the market had already responded to it and offshore USD bond prices fell sharply.

In theory, centralized cases can prevent suppliers across the country from continuously freezing the Group’s assets through litigation, which means Evergrande can earn a little breathing space given that it is sued for overdue commercial papers every few days. However, China Fortune Land, Peking Founder and HNA Group who have previously defaulted had also been centralized before. Therefore, some believe that the purpose of the government's action is to pave the way for Evergrande's debt restructuring.

The market has different interpretations. In fact, the latest Government statement instructs Evergrande to ensure that normal operations of its 798 projects in 234 cities are made its top priority by handling the debts through ‘market approach’. They also mention that the Guangdong Province and Evergrande should speed up the asset disposal plan.

It is difficult to guess the true meaning behind these intriguing statements. Therefore, we can only look at Evergrande’s fundamentals and believe that the group will not be forced into a debt restructuring process involving any kind of ‘haircut’ such as principal reduction or replacement, as long as the group is capable of handling the debts on its own.

What we should pay attention to is that Evergrande differs from the above-mentioned companies: it has yet to default on any interest-bearing liabilities when the litigations were centralized. In addition, Evergrande does not have onshore and offshore bonds due this year, and the Group is still able to repay debts such as bank and trust loans on time. As mentioned in our previous update, those debt instruments are of a different importance to the Group, and commercial papers can generally be repaid in a more flexible way. Therefore, it is reasonable for Evergrande to retain as much cash as possible at the group level.

Repaying Debts using Sales Cash Inflows are Still Feasible

Previously, the group had announced that its total debt at the end of June had been reduced to less than 600 billion yuan. With reference to JP Morgan’s calculations, bank loans accounted for about 45% of these debts, and trust loans accounted for another 25%. This part of the debt due is about 180 billion yuan in the second half of the year.

According to S&P's latest forecast, Evergrande has to repay over 240 billion yuan of commercial papers in the next 12 months, and approximately 100 billion yuan of them will mature in the rest of 2021. In other words, the total amount of debts and commercial papers to be repaid in these final months of the year chalks up to about 300 billion yuan, based on the assumption that the group cannot extend any of its bank loans and trust loans that are about to expire.

Given that the group previously announced its net gearing ratio had improved to below 100%, thus meeting one of the Three Red Line requirements, we believe that Evergrande still had cash reserves of about 200 billion yuan at end-June. 

However, referring to the example of Sichuan Languang - although there was 12 billion yuan in cash on their books at the end of June, only 200 million yuan was actually freely available. The rest were in the pre-sale project supervision accounts and joint-project accounts (used to ensure that the project has sufficient funds for development), so we must also apply a certain discount when evaluating Evergrande’s situation.

Currently, since Evergrande’s short-term bond yields are extremely high, even shadow banks will not lend extra money to the group. Therefore, all of the group’s debt financing channels should have been cut off. Despite that, Evergrande’s sales collection in the first half of the year has reached 320 billion yuan, and its collection ratio remained high at 90%. Thus, after the complete cessation of land acquisition, we believe it is still feasible for Evergrande to repay debts using sales cash inflows.

Sales Performance Depends on Preventing Nationwide Construction Suspensions

Under this circumstance, it becomes crucial for the group to maintain its sales performance in the next few months. Looking at the sales figures in July, Evergrande recorded 43.8 billion yuan in contracted sales, a 39% m-o-m decline. Although July is the traditionally regarded as off-season and the average performance of the top 100 developers also fell by 33% m-o-m according to CRIC, Evergrande’s overall performance was still slightly worse than its peers. It sales progress is slightly behind schedule as the group has only achieved 53% of its sales target in the first 7 months.

Construction projects are now also being affected as a consequence of the commercial paper incidents. Recently, some of Evergrande’s construction suppliers have already announced a temporary suspension of construction. These include:

  • Yuezhong Group (Yangmei indemnificatory apartment, Evergrande Metropolis Square in Shenzhen)
  • Nantong Sanjian Holdings (Evergrande Cultural Tourism City in Taicang)
  • Chongqing Construction Engineering Group (Splendor Emei Phase Two and Kunhai Lake in Kunming)

We estimate that the total amount of overdue commercial papers on these projects will add up to more than 600 million yuan.

These projects are now in construction, meaning that the pre-sales period has already ended, and will not have much impact on sales cash inflows. However, if the projects are abandoned, it will definitely affect the confidence of future homebuyers. Therefore, if Evergrande wants to maintain its sales figures, it must speed up its quest for liquidity and prevent nationwide large-scale construction shutdowns.

Assets Sales can Help Ease Liquidity Pressure

At this juncture, selling assets is essentially the most appropriate method. Evergrande has continued to carry out equity financing in recent months (see Table 1), and we believe these subsidiaries will serve as key assets in sustaining the group’s cash flows.

Table 1: Evergrande’s Major Listed Subsidiaries and Recent Equity Financing

Month

Subsidiary

Amount

Remarks

March

Fangchebao

16.4 billion HKD

72% ownership

May

Evergrande New Energy Vehicle

10.6 billion HKD

65% ownership, market cap about 126.2 billion HKD

June

Calxon Group

3.0 billion yuan

28% ownership, market cap about 7.1 billion RMB

June & July

HengTen Networks

7.7 billion HKD

27% ownership, market cap about 44.4 billion HKD

Evergrande Property Services: 60% ownership, market cap about 74.1 billion HKD

Shengjing Bank: 36% ownership, market cap about 60.7 billion HKD

Planning to list Cultural tourism and healthcare division, Evergrande Spring and Fangchebao

Source: Company announcements, HKEX, Shenzhen Exchange, Hithink

Data as at 12 August 2021


In addition to selling 11% of Hengten Network's holdings to Tencent and an independent third party last month, Evergrande also announced on 10 August that it was planning to sell its equity holdings in Evergrande New Energy Vehicle and Evergrande Property Services. The group has also sold its 50% stake in real estate project company, Suzhou Shengjian, to Chongqing International Trust on 6 August.

However, we believe that it is unlikely that the group will choose to sell a large amount of land reserves. After all, it is difficult to directly sell the urban renewal projects and the projects acquired from ‘land sale by application’, as they are limited by specific terms and conditions. Therefore, introducing capital investments into the projects should be a better choice. Recently, it has been reported that Evergrande is in negotiation with several state-owned enterprises in Guangdong Province to cooperate in the development of urban renewal projects in Shenzhen, which should be able to offer some liquidity to the group.

In fact, we believe that selling equity ownership is more effective than selling the land projects. After all, as a real estate developer, land projects should be of the top priority. Not only will they affect the group’s ability to access financing channels through collaterals, but they also reflect the group's future prospects and sustainability. Therefore, if Evergrande has the determination to sacrifice most of its non-core businesses in exchange for over 100 billion yuan of monetary assets, it will greatly ease the pressure on its cash flows.

During this period of relentless negative news, we have repeatedly mentioned that Evergrande’s strength comes from its sales cash inflow and asset portfolio, and its deleveraging pace is reasonable. Thus, with an extremely high yield offering at this moment, its short-term bonds still look attractive to us.

Evergrande is expected to announce its interim results before the end of August; we will be back with another credit update then.

Read our previous updates here:


Our podcast series, Yield Hunters, is available on SpotifyiTunes Podcasts and Google Podcasts. We share our thoughts on new bond issues and hold discussions on the fixed income space. Listen to our latest episode below and follow us!    


Declaration: For specific disclosure, at the time of publication of this report, IFPL (via its connected and associated entities) has a principal position in EVERRE 7.500% 28Jun2023 Corp (USD) and EVERRE 8.250% 23Mar2022 Corp (USD). The analyst who produced this report holds a NIL position in the abovementioned securities.

All materials and contents found in this site are strictly for general circulation and informational purposes only and should not be considered as an offer, or solicitation, to deal in any of the funds or products found/identified in this site. While iFAST Financial Pte Ltd ("IFPL") has tried to provide accurate and timely information, there may be inadvertent delays, omissions, technical or factual inaccuracies and typographical errors. Any opinion or estimate contained in this report is made on a general basis and neither IFPL nor any of its servants or agents have given any consideration to nor have they or any of them made any investigation of the investment objective, financial situation or particular need of any user or reader, any specific person or group of persons. You should consider carefully if the products you are going to purchase are suitable for your investment objective, investment experience, risk tolerance and other personal circumstances. If you are uncertain about the suitability of the investment product, please seek advice from a financial adviser, before making a decision to purchase the investment product. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The value of the investment products and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. In respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with the said research analyses or research reports, recipients of the report are to contact IFPL at 10 Collyer Quay, #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Building, Singapore 049315, or by telephone at +65 6557 2853. Where the report contains research analyses or research reports from a foreign research house and if the recipient of such research analyses or research reports is not an accredited investor, expert investor, institutional investor or an ex-accredited investor, IFPL accepts legal responsibility for the contents of such analyses or reports to such persons only to the extent as required by law. Please note that only certain security(ies) herein are available to all investors, while the rest are only available for certain persons to invest in, such as Accredited Investors (as defined in the Securities and Futures Act) or one who invests at least S$200,000 (or its equivalent currency) per transaction. To qualify as an Accredited Investor, one needs to submit a declaration form and certain relevant supporting documents, according to iFAST’s prevailing policies and procedures.

Please read our full disclaimers on the website at ( https://secure.fundsupermart.com/fsmone/policies/328125/investment-account-terms-&-conditions).

iFAST Financial Pte Ltd (IFPL) (registered address: 10 Collyer Quay #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Singapore 049315, Telephone: 6557 2000) holds the Financial Advisers Licence issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore ('MAS') to conduct regulated activities of advising on securities, marketing of collective investment schemes and arranging of any contract of insurance in respect of life policies, other than a contract of reinsurance and the Capital Markets Services Licence issued by the MAS to conduct regulated activities of dealing in securities and providing custodial services for securities. While IFPL has made every effort to ensure the independence of the report's contents, IFPL's nature of business is such that IFPL and its connected and associated entities together with their respective directors, officers and staff may be involved in providing dealing or investment-related services in the abovementioned securities, and have taken or may take positions in the securities mentioned in this report, and may also act as the principal for any buy or sell trades.

Please note that only certain bond(s) herein are available to all investors, while the rest are only available for certain persons to invest in, such as Accredited Investors (as defined in the Securities and Futures Act) or one who invests at least S$200,000 (or its equivalent currency) per transaction. To qualify as an Accredited Investor, one needs to submit a declaration form and certain relevant supporting documents, according to Fundsupermart.com's prevailing policies and procedures. Please read our full disclaimers in the website.

Ways to Invest with FSMOne
Why FSM
Don't have an account with us?
Open an account here
Need Financial Advice?
Make an appointment

We use cookies If you close this message or continue to use this site, you will consent to the use of Cookies, unless you choose to disable them. Click on our Privacy Policy to understand more.