Macro Research

The inevitable reversal in interest rate cycle in the next 2 years

The low interest rate environment is coming to an end. Investors should keep in view the consequent implications on asset classes.

  • |
  • Published on 14 Jul 2021

The inevitable reversal in interest rate cycle in the next 2 years | Open a FREE FSMOne account and manage all your investments conveniently in ONE place


  • We expect two inflation scenarios moving forward and caution investors against both scenarios given the consequent implications on asset classes.
  1. For the central case, our higher probability scenario, we see hot inflation prints in 2H21 before cooling off in 2022 and 2023. In this scenario, core PCE will likely settle between 2 - 3% over the next two years.
  2. For the hawkish case, our lower probability scenario, we see hot inflation prints extending beyond 2021 and core PCE to remain above 3% over the next two years, reflecting our view of a high level of persistent inflation.
  • Both our central and hawkish case points to a reversal in the interest rate cycle in late 2022. For the former, we anticipate one rate hike around end-2022 and up to two hikes in 2023. For the latter, we anticipate two rate hikes in 2022 and up to two - three hikes in 2023.
  • With the higher inflation backdrop presented in both cases, we believe inflation risk is currently underpriced. For our central case, we expect yields to reach 2-3% over the next two years. If our hawkish case materialises instead, yields may surge even higher to 3-4% in the same timeframe.
  • For our hawkish case, we expect equities to struggle if the 10-year yield climbs to 3-4% within the next two years. An earnings yield of 6.1% for global equities and a 3-4% yield would imply an excess yield of 2.1 to 3.1%, which is below the 10-year historical average of 3.5%. This implies that bonds should be relatively more attractive than equities.
  • For our central case – we expect equities to be able to digest a 10-year yield of below 2.7%. An earnings yield of 6.1% and 10-year yield of 2% - 2.6% would imply an excess yield of 3.5% to 4.1%, which is above the 10-year historical average. This implies that equities should be relatively more attractive than bonds. 

Our US Inflation Outlook


The US inflation debate remains top of mind for many investors right now. At the moment, US inflation prints (core PCE of 3.4% in May ’21) are at the highest since the early 1990s, with many pondering will such hot prints will be ‘transitory’. To determine our inflation outlook, we examine the core PCE inflation, the Fed’s primary measurement of inflation which excludes food and energy prices.

A breakdown of core PCE inflation shows that Covid-sensitive categories (likely transitory) have been the predominant driver of inflation (chart 1). These are categories where either prices or quantities were significantly influenced by the pandemic. In fact, over the past two months, these categories contributed to more than 75% of the inflation reading. On the other hand, Covid-insensitive categories have just rebounded to their pre-pandemic rate. Base effect is also a major transitory factor contributing to higher inflation prints as lower comps in 2Q/3Q resulted in a significant skew in prints. Adjusting for base effect (after Feb ’20), the core PCE ends up 30% lower than reported (chart 2).

As data suggests, a big part of inflation can indeed be attributed to transitory factors, captured by both Covid-sensitive categories and base effect. We believe this pressure may gradually fade as supply constrain eases, which will take time, likely over the next 2-3 quarters as the global re-opening sequence play out. However, as these factors fade, it is likely to unveil a certain level of persistent inflation, underpinned by housing-related and monetary inflation 

Red flags are showing up in housing-related inflation, which represents around an outsized 19% of core PCE. Over the past year, US median home sales price growth has skyrocketed catalysed by the combination of base effect, higher material cost, and lower mortgage rates. With rising home prices often portending higher housing inflation (former leads the latter by approximately 13 months), we expect housing-related inflation to bottom and turn higher soon. A run-up in housing-related inflation towards pre-Covid levels may keep core PCE likely elevated over the next 1-2 years. 

We also remain concerned, and cognizant, of the impact of monetary inflation on a longer-lasting increase in prices. With the enactment of the dramatic level of quantitative easing by the US Federal Reserve, tremendous liquidity has been injected into the real economy. Essentially, this inflates the quantity of money in circulation, engendering stronger aggregate demand which can ultimately pressure price level higher (and perhaps longer if the monetary base remains elevated). In our view, the inflation risk emanates from the sheer magnitude of asset purchase in this current episode of Fed QE as compared to history.

Chart 1: Core PCE inflation decomposed by Covid sensitive and insensitive components

 

Chart 2: Core PCE inflation adjusted for base effect 


Chart 3: Rising home sales price implies higher housing-related inflation (19% of Core PCE) to come


 

Different Inflation Scenarios to Prepare For


Putting all things together, we expect two inflation scenarios moving forward (table 1). For the central case, which is our higher probability scenario, we see hot inflation prints in 2H21 before cooling off in 2022 and 2023. In this scenario, core PCE will likely settle between 2 - 3% over the next two years (’21 – ’23) which is higher than post-GFC average of 1.6% (chart 4).  This reflects a moderate inflationary pressure coming from the persistent components such as housing-related and wage inflation.

For the hawkish case, which is our lower probability scenario, we see hot inflation prints extending beyond 2021 and core PCE to remain above 3% over the next two years. Contrasting to the central case, this reflects a significant inflationary pressure on coming from i) persistent components (much higher than central case), and ii) longer-lasting inflation from Covid-sensitive categories (beyond 2H21). Despite being a lower probability scenario, we caution investors against this scenario given the major consequent implications on asset classes.

Table 1: Our central and hawkish case for US inflation

 Source: iFAST research. Data as of July 2021. 

Chart 4: Inflation over the next 1-2 years may settle at a higher level as compared to post-GFC

 

The Impending Reversal in Interest Rate Cycle


Through our observations from the Fed’s meeting minutes thus far,  we believe the cue for a rate hike is likely the product of 3 considerations: i) Core PCE at 2% and above, ii) Core PCE exceeding 2% for some time, and iii) Maximum employment. Our current inflation outlook – both central and hawkish case - implies that the first and second criteria can be met by end-2022, leaving the Fed’s employment target as a wildcard to watch in our opinion. 

Firstly, payroll gains will have to impress to the tune of 530k jobs added monthly on average to close the existing unemployment gap of an estimated 9 million jobs between now and pre-pandemic trend. Thus far, payroll gains have averaged at a positive monthly rate of 540k in the year-to-date. While it is still pre-mature to expect gains at such level to continue, the employment recovery seems to be on track based on payroll data. Secondly, other indicators such as unemployment claims and participation rate have also improved in the last few months, painting the same picture. Therefore, what is left now is for unemployment rate (which remain stubborn) to dip, thereby confirming an improving labor market.

That said, we opine that the US economy could be on-trend to achieving maximum employment by 2023, prompting an earlier rate hike in 2022. Any upside to inflation risk (our hawkish case) can certainly bring forward rate hikes as well, even before maximum employment is achieved. 

Thus, both our central and hawkish case points to a reversal in the interest rate cycle in late 2022, invoking an end to the low interest rate environment (chart 5). For our central case, we are anticipating one rate hike around end-2022 and up to two hikes in 2023. For our hawkish case, we see two rate hikes in 2022, and up to two - three hikes in 2023.

Chart 5: We expect a reversal in the interest rate cycle in late-2022


Our Central and Hawkish Case Portend Higher Treasury Yields


The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield tumbled to its lowest levels since February, having rallied for the past few months to close at 1.36% as of July 9th. However, our inflation and policy outlook suggests that there continues to be upside in 10Y yields over the next year or two (chart 6).

Investors have been pricing longer-term inflation risk lower as suggested by the fall in the 10-year inflation breakeven – the product of nominal yields minus real yields, loosely understood as “inflation compensation”. The implied market expectations for inflation - the 5Y-5Y swap rates (average five-year inflation rate in five years) - has also trended downwards since February. 

However, with the higher inflation backdrop presented in both our central and hawkish cases, we believe inflation risk is currently underpriced. Looking forward, we expect “inflation compensation” to rise if our case comes to bear, thereby pushing 10Y yields higher over the next couple of years. For our central case, we expect yields to reach 2-3% over the next two years. If our hawkish case materialises instead, yields may surge even higher to 3-4% in the same time frame.

Chart 6: 10-year treasury yields, which have declined over the years, may turn higher on the back of rising inflation

  

Investment implications for both central and hawkish case


While our hawkish scenario, whereby yields return to levels last reached between 2008 and 2011, may seem extreme at first glance, investors should nonetheless pay heed to the possibility of it coming into play.

We expect equities to struggle if the 10-year yield climbs to 3-4% within the next two years (table 2). An earnings yield of 6.1% for global equities (inverse of 16.4x forward PE ratio (2023 EPS) for MSCI ACWI Index) and a 3% yield would imply an excess yield - earnings yield minus 10-year yield - of 3.1%, which is marginally below the 10-year historical average of 3.5% (chart 7). In fact, a 4% yield would reduce the excess yield (2.6%) to near one standard deviation below the historical average. At such low levels, the excess yield implies that bonds should be relatively more attractive than equities thus, justifying an overweight over the latter in a portfolio allocation.

Aside from the inter-asset implications, we anticipate more severe intra-asset consequences should our hawkish case pan out. Within equity markets, we expect longer-duration assets such as growth stocks to take a relatively harder hit as equity valuations tend to be the first casualty of inflation. 

An appropriate response by investors, within the universe of growth stocks, would then be to pivot away from those with weak fundamentals (i.e. weaker balance sheet strength, higher earnings volatility) towards those of higher quality and stronger fundamentals (typically the mega or large-cap companies). The latter are more resilient in a rising yield environment and possess stronger pricing power to defend margins in a high inflation backdrop.

Within bond markets, investors should also consider tailoring their duration exposure. We believe leaning towards short to intermediate duration while staying away from the longer-dated ones can help avoid (bond) price downside in an event of a run-up in treasury yields. 

For our central case, equities should be able to digest a 10-year yield of below 2.7% especially if the rise is gradual and amidst a backdrop of economic growth. A similar earnings yield of 6.1% for global equities and 10-year yield of 2%-2.6% would imply an excess yield (earnings yield minus 10-year yield) of 3.5% - 4.1% which is above the 10-year historical average. 

This suggests that in our central case, equities should be relatively more attractive than bonds, thereby justifying an overweight over the latter. A look at the various asset’s beta to inflation breakeven (chart 8) reinforces that equities should perform better (due to higher beta) than bonds when inflation expectation rises again.

Chart 7: Excess yield (earnings yield to bond yield spread) currently marginally above historical average


 

Table 2: The asset allocation implication for each case and the corresponding yield projection

 Source: iFAST research. Data as of July 2021. 

Chart 8: Various asset’s beta to inflation breakeven – Measures how the asset price move when inflation breakeven changes

 
The Research Team is part of iFAST Financial Pte Ltd.

All materials and contents found in this site are strictly for general circulation and informational purposes only and should not be considered as an offer, or solicitation, to deal in any of the funds or products found/identified in this site. While iFAST Financial Pte Ltd ("IFPL") has tried to provide accurate and timely information, there may be inadvertent delays, omissions, technical or factual inaccuracies and typographical errors. Any opinion or estimate contained in this report is made on a general basis and neither IFPL nor any of its servants or agents have given any consideration to nor have they or any of them made any investigation of the investment objective, financial situation or particular need of any user or reader, any specific person or group of persons. You should consider carefully if the products you are going to purchase are suitable for your investment objective, investment experience, risk tolerance and other personal circumstances. If you are uncertain about the suitability of the investment product, please seek advice from a financial adviser, before making a decision to purchase the investment product. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The value of the investment products and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. In respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with the said research analyses or research reports, recipients of the report are to contact IFPL at 10 Collyer Quay, #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Building, Singapore 049315, or by telephone at +65 6557 2853. Where the report contains research analyses or research reports from a foreign research house and if the recipient of such research analyses or research reports is not an accredited investor, expert investor, institutional investor or an ex-accredited investor, IFPL accepts legal responsibility for the contents of such analyses or reports to such persons only to the extent as required by law. Please note that only certain security(ies) herein are available to all investors, while the rest are only available for certain persons to invest in, such as Accredited Investors (as defined in the Securities and Futures Act) or one who invests at least S$200,000 (or its equivalent currency) per transaction. To qualify as an Accredited Investor, one needs to submit a declaration form and certain relevant supporting documents, according to iFAST’s prevailing policies and procedures.

Please read our full disclaimers on the website at ( https://secure.fundsupermart.com/fsmone/policies/328125/investment-account-terms-&-conditions).

iFAST Financial Pte Ltd (IFPL) (registered address: 10 Collyer Quay #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Singapore 049315, Telephone: 6557 2000) holds the Financial Advisers Licence issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore ('MAS') to conduct regulated activities of advising on securities, marketing of collective investment schemes and arranging of any contract of insurance in respect of life policies, other than a contract of reinsurance and the Capital Markets Services Licence issued by the MAS to conduct regulated activities of dealing in securities and providing custodial services for securities. While IFPL has made every effort to ensure the independence of the report's contents, IFPL's nature of business is such that IFPL and its connected and associated entities together with their respective directors, officers and staff may be involved in providing dealing or investment-related services in the abovementioned securities, and have taken or may take positions in the securities mentioned in this report, and may also act as the principal for any buy or sell trades.

Ways to Invest with FSMOne
Why FSM
Don't have an account with us?
Open an account here
Need Financial Advice?
Make an appointment

We use cookies If you close this message or continue to use this site, you will consent to the use of Cookies, unless you choose to disable them. Click on our Privacy Policy to understand more.