The 7 points you should take away from China’s “ Two Sessions”

China has unveiled new targets for 2024. What signals do the "Two Sessions" send to the economy? How realistic are these targets? Read on to get the latest updates on China's 'Two Sessions' and find out our perspectives on the market.

Hu You
Hu You06 Mar 2024 3753 Views
The 7 points you should take away from China’s “ Two Sessions”

1.   China’s GDP target is set at around 5% again this year. Is it a positive or negative sign? 

China's decision to set the GDP growth target at around 5% doesn't come as a surprise, given its previous announcement during the Central Economic Work Conference (CEWC) in December 2023.

Acknowledged by Premier Li, achieving this target will be a challenging task. We do not rule out the possibility of achieving the target, but it will be harder compared to last year. With China achieving a 5.2% GDP growth in 2023, the high base comparison will inevitably impact the growth outlook for 2024. It is worth recognising that the favourable base comparison in 2023 played a role in meeting its target, particularly given the constrained GDP growth of 3% in 2022 due to Covid restrictions.

Looking at the breakdown of individual provinces' GDP growth targets this year, 27 out of 31 provinces set targets of around 5% to 6% (Table 1). This would make the weighted average growth exceed the 5% target. However, compared to 2023, only four provinces increased their targets, while 16 made downward adjustments. Provinces that made downward adjustments are the ones most struggling with local debts, such as Yunnan, Guangxi, and Heilongjiang. This indicates a cautious outlook, with most provinces less optimistic about achieving the growth witnessed in 2023.

Table 1: 2024 Growth Targets of 31 Provinces

Provinces and Regions

Growth Target

Number of Provinces

Tianjin

~4.5%

1

Beijing, Shanghai, Guangdong, Jiangsu, Shandong, Qinghai, Guangxi, Shanxi, Yunnan, Jiangxi

~5%

10

Liaoning, Zhejiang, Shaanxi, Heilongjiang, Fujian, Hebei, Guizhou, Henan

~5.5%

8

Chongqing, Jilin, Gansu, Sichuan, Anhui, Ningxia, Hubei, Inner Mongolia

~6%

9

Xinjiang

~6.5%

1

Tibet, Hainan

~8%

2

Source: Chinanews, iFAST Compilations

Data as of 2 Feb 2024


2.  What does the growth target imply about the stimulus outlook?

We anticipate an uptick in fiscal stimulus, evident in the language of 'proactive,' 'appropriately intensified,' and 'improved in quality and efficiency’ as well as the ambitious growth target.  This is evident by a slight increment in the special local government bond quota, rising from last year’s 3.8 trillion yuan to 3.9 trillion yuan for infrastructure spending. Despite the modest increase, the primary focus of this stimulus package remains risk mitigation rather than a substantial economic boost.

In addition, China is bolstering its efforts with plans to issue 1 trillion yuan of ultra-long (over 10 years) special treasury bonds annually for several years. These bonds will fund major national strategies, emphasising long-term projects with extended return cycles, such as urban village renovations, national computing hubs, and data centres.

While maintaining a fiscal deficit cap at 3%, the experience from last year suggests a potential mid-year adjustment if additional stimulus is deemed necessary to achieve GDP growth.

Regarding monetary policy, the current stance is described as 'flexible, appropriate, targeted, and effective.' This represents a slight moderation from last November's policy report, which used terms like 'targeted and forceful.' PBOC recently made a 50bps cut in the required reserve ratio and there could be room to cut it further. However, we do not think there will be an abrupt adjustment to the 5-year loan prime rate in the near term after a recent 25bp reduction.


3.  Can the property market rebound this year?

For the first time since 2019, the government omits the slogan 'housing is for living in, not speculation’ for the work report. This shift signals a current focus on reviving and stabilising the property market. However, in February, China Real Estate Information Corp (CRIC) revealed a staggering 60% YoY drop in contracted sales for the top 100 developers, amounting to a record low of 185.9 billion yuan only. This indicates that the sector is far from making a turnaround.

To address the sector's difficulties, China will continue to rely on pledged supplemental lending (PSL) and the newly implemented 'project whitelist.' As of 28 February, commercial banks have approved over 200 billion yuan in loans for qualified real estate projects. While these policies aim to enhance housing delivery, their impact on reducing excessive supplies remains limited.


4.  What strides has China made in the development of innovative chips and new technologies?

China has shown unwavering determination in developing homegrown technology, spanning electric vehicles (EVs), chips, space tech, and quantum computing. While supporting Huawei in chip innovation, China's current progress still falls short of competing with industry giants like Nvidia or AMD, especially with OPPO's chipmaking division ZEKU closing in 2023. Recent obstacles for AMD's tailored chips for China further underscore the challenges, indicating a formidable journey for China to catch up.

During the meeting, Premier Li highlighted China's focus on developing 'intelligent connected new energy vehicles,' integrating electric batteries with intelligent features driven by semiconductors, extensive data sets, and computing capabilities. However, the U.S. has initiated an investigation into vehicles imported from China, citing national security risks. In a worst-case scenario, the U.S. could impose bans, as seen with TikTok. Amid an increasingly hostile external environment, coupled with a slowing economy and local governments burdened by debt, China's innovation may face potential technical and capital constraints for ventures with extended return cycles.


5.  Can we expect China's accommodative foreign policy to persist?

China is adopting a less assertive stance in its foreign policy. Regarding the Taiwan issue, Premier Li stated that China will resolutely 'oppose' independence, contrasting with previously used terms such as 'fight' independence. China aims to send a friendlier message to attract foreign capital and regain the confidence of foreign investors. Hence, we believe this tone will persist, at least for now.


6.  What implications does Premier Li Qiang's absence from the press conference hold for China's transparency?

Legitimate concerns about China's transparency have arisen, particularly with the unprecedented omission of the traditional press conference featuring the premier after the National People’s Congress. This departure from historical norms has sparked doubt, prompting questions about whether this reflects a form of forceful state control, wherein only one person's perspective is deemed significant. This has and will continue to send negative sentiments to the market.


7.  Do we change our views on China after the work report? If not, what do we need to see before turning more neutral on China?

We project an upside potential of 11.8% for the MSCI China Index by the end of 2026 (Table 2). However, there are no positive catalysts on the horizon that could trigger a re-rating. Given the economic slowdown, ongoing challenges faced by the property sector, and an increasingly hostile external environment, investors still face substantial risks.

We will prioritise our attention on three key areas. Firstly, we will assess the stabilisation in the property market, indicated by improvements in the delivery rate and a deceleration in the decline of contracted sales. We will also closely monitor the impact of adjustments to the 5-year loan prime rate (LPR) and the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) on credit demand. Secondly, we will focus on the improvement in consumption demand and its potential to drive higher inflation rates. China's January consumer price index recorded a 0.8% YoY decline, significantly below the target of 3%. Lastly, we will assess confidence in China's market, evaluating whether it translates into stronger investment sentiments rather than relying solely on support from the 'national team'.

Hence, we continue to recommend investors to underweight China in their portfolios. Within equities, investors may consider shifting their investments towards the ‘New Asian Tigers’ - Singapore, Japan, and South Korea.

Table 2: Upside Projection for MSCI China Index

MSCI China Index

FY23

FY24E

FY25E

FY26E

PE Ratio (X)

10.5

10.2

9.5

8.6

Expected Earnings Growth (YoY%)

1.4%

3.2%

6.8%

10.5%

Earnings Per Share (EPS)

4.8

5.0

5.4

5.9

Projected Fair Price (based on a fair PE ratio of 10.0X)

59.5

Potential Upside

11.8%

Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P., iFAST Compilations
Data as of 5 Mar 2024

 



Declaration:

For specific disclosure, at the time of publication of this report, IFPL (via its connected and associated entities) and the analyst who produced this report hold a NIL position in the abovementioned securities.

All materials and contents found in this site are strictly for general circulation and informational purposes only and should not be considered as an offer, or solicitation, to deal in any of the funds or products found/identified in this site. While iFAST Financial Pte Ltd ("IFPL") has tried to provide accurate and timely information, there may be inadvertent delays, omissions, technical or factual inaccuracies and typographical errors. Any opinion or estimate contained in this report is made on a general basis and neither IFPL nor any of its servants or agents have given any consideration to nor have they or any of them made any investigation of the investment objective, financial situation or particular need of any user or reader, any specific person or group of persons. You should consider carefully if the products you are going to purchase are suitable for your investment objective, investment experience, risk tolerance and other personal circumstances. If you are uncertain about the suitability of the investment product, please seek advice from a financial adviser, before making a decision to purchase the investment product. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The value of the investment products and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. In respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with the said research analyses or research reports, recipients of the report are to contact IFPL at 10 Collyer Quay, #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Building, Singapore 049315, or by telephone at +65 6557 2853. Where the report contains research analyses or research reports from a foreign research house and if the recipient of such research analyses or research reports is not an accredited investor, expert investor, institutional investor or an ex-accredited investor, IFPL accepts legal responsibility for the contents of such analyses or reports to such persons only to the extent as required by law. Please note that only certain security(ies) herein are available to all investors, while the rest are only available for certain persons to invest in, such as Accredited Investors (as defined in the Securities and Futures Act) or one who invests at least S$200,000 (or its equivalent currency) per transaction. To qualify as an Accredited Investor, one needs to submit a declaration form and certain relevant supporting documents, according to iFAST’s prevailing policies and procedures.

Please read our full disclaimers on the website at ( https://secure.fundsupermart.com/fsmone/policies/328125/investment-account-terms-&-conditions).

iFAST Financial Pte Ltd (IFPL) (registered address: 10 Collyer Quay #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Singapore 049315, Telephone: 6557 2000) holds the Financial Advisers Licence issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore ('MAS') to conduct regulated activities of advising on securities, marketing of collective investment schemes and arranging of any contract of insurance in respect of life policies, other than a contract of reinsurance and the Capital Markets Services Licence issued by the MAS to conduct regulated activities of dealing in securities and providing custodial services for securities. While IFPL has made every effort to ensure the independence of the report's contents, IFPL's nature of business is such that IFPL and its connected and associated entities together with their respective directors, officers and staff may be involved in providing dealing or investment-related services in the abovementioned securities, and have taken or may take positions in the securities mentioned in this report, and may also act as the principal for any buy or sell trades.