Idea of the Week : Intel’s darkest hour has passed — AI and foundry as dual drivers

Intel Corporation, founded in 1968, is a leading global semiconductor company with businesses spanning Client Computing Group (CCG), Data Center and AI (DCAI), Intel Foundry, and other advanced technology solutions. The company has long dominated the PC and server markets with its x86 architecture, and in recent years has been actively transforming itself by investing in AI chips and foundry services to respond to the strong rise of competitors such as NVIDIA in the AI accelerator market.

iFAST Research Team
iFAST Research Team28 May 2026 154 Views
Idea of the Week : Intel’s darkest hour has passed — AI and foundry as dual drivers

Highlights:

  • Benefiting from strong AI computing demand, Intel’s 2025 DCAI revenue increased by 5% YoY to US$16.9 billion, Intel Foundry grew by 3% YoY to US$17.8 billion, total revenue was flat at US$52.9 billion, and operating losses narrowed significantly, indicating that the transformation is gradually taking effect.
  • Cash balance totalled US$33 billion, net gearing fell to 9.7%, debt maturities are reasonably staggered, short-term liquidity remains ample, and the credit base is still sound.

  • Among the dollar bonds available on the platform, Intel bonds offer net yields to maturity of 4.4% to 6.1%. Longer-dated bonds provide a clear spread pickup versus comparable peers, making them relatively attractive.

Intel Corporation, founded in 1968, is a leading global semiconductor company with businesses spanning Client Computing Group (CCG), Data Center and AI (DCAI), Intel Foundry, and other advanced technology solutions. The company has long dominated the PC and server markets with its x86 architecture, and in recent years has been actively transforming itself by investing in AI chips and foundry services to respond to the strong rise of competitors such as NVIDIA in the AI accelerator market. As of May 2026, Intel’s market cap is approximately US$580 billion.

In 2025, Intel continued to make heavy capex to support AI infrastructure and the R&D of its advanced 18A process technology. At the same time, ongoing losses in the Intel Foundry business kept market concerns about its free cash flow and debt sustainability elevated, causing Intel’s CDS spread to widen to over 80 bps at one point. However, in August 2025, Intel received explicit backing from the U.S. government — with the Trump administration formally taking a 10% stake for US$8.9 billion, cementing Intel’s position as a core domestic advanced semiconductor manufacturer in the United States. In addition, Intel’s Q1 2026 results significantly beat expectations, sending its share price up by as much as 100%. Against this backdrop of debt pressure and sovereign backing, are Intel’s U.S.-dollar bonds a value trap or a worthwhile investment opportunity? This article will provide a deep dive into Intel’s historical performance and its financial results for the first quarter of 2026 and assess them one by one.

*18A is Intel’s latest advanced semiconductor process technology, currently equivalent to the roughly 1.8-nanometer node. In terms of performance and power efficiency, it is superior to TSMC’s most advanced mass-production process, TSMC N2 (TechInsights performance score 2.53 vs 2.27), and its mass-production timing is earlier, but its transistor density still lags behind TSMC N2. It can be used for consumer-grade and AI processors and is also an important product for the company’s foundry services (Intel Foundry).

AI and Foundry as the Two Engines of Transformation, with Results Gradually Becoming Visible

Intel recorded *total revenue of US$52.9 billion in 2025, broadly flat YoY versus US$53.1 billion in 2024, mainly supported by growth contribution from the data center business driven by AI demand (see Chart 1). Operating losses narrowed sharply to US$2.21 billion from US$11.68 billion in 2024, indicating that the cost pressure associated with the transformation is gradually easing, although there remains a meaningful gap before the company can return to profitability (see Chart 2).

*Intel’s total revenue is lower than the sum of segment revenues mainly because internal chip sales from Intel Foundry to the product divisions (CCG and DCAI) are eliminated under GAAP segment reporting requirements.

Chart 1: Intel segment revenue contribution

Chart 2: Intel segment operating income and operating margin

By business segment

CCG generated revenue of US$32.2 billion, down 3% YoY, but it remained the company’s largest revenue source (61% of total revenue). Although overall PC demand recovered only gradually, Intel’s Core Ultra processor shipments remained resilient, and AI PC features helped improve the premium product mix, supporting revenue stability.

DCAI recorded revenue of US$16.9 billion, up 5% YoY, making it the brightest growth segment. AI compute demand drove shipments of Gaudi accelerators and Xeon server CPUs, while DCAI operating margin improved materially to 20% from 9% in 2024; operating profit surged 243% YoY to US$3.4 billion, reflecting a higher contribution from AI-related, higher-margin products.

Since 2024, Intel has reported Intel Foundry as a separate segment because its manufacturing costs and product business were previously reported together, which long obscured idle-capacity issues. After the separation, Foundry charges the product divisions market-based foundry fees, and all costs are fully reflected in a standalone income statement, allowing manufacturing efficiency to be assessed more accurately. In addition, the separate segment structure keeps customer data fully isolated from Intel’s product division, which is a prerequisite for winning external foundry clients’ trust.

Intel Foundry generated revenue of US$17.8 billion, up 3% YoY, but total costs reached US$28.1 billion, resulting in an operating loss of US$10.3 billion. Gross margin remained under pressure due to several overlapping factors: large-scale fab expansion in prior years pushed depreciation expense to US$10.7 billion; 18A process yields improved from roughly 20% to 30% at the beginning of 2025 to around 65% by year-end, but still fell short of the level needed for normal profitability; and weak external customer demand meant that a large amount of idle capacity could not be spread across enough volume, leaving gross margins below expectations.

Q1 2026 Takeaways: AI Momentum Accelerates, Profitability Steadily Recovering

Revenue in Q1 2026 came in at USD 13.6 billion, up 7% YoY, beating market consensus of USD 12.4 billion. AI-driven businesses led the quarter, with DCAI and Intel Foundry revenues rising 22% and 16% YoY to USD 5.1 billion and USD 5.4 billion respectively, validating management's earlier thesis on the AI demand transition. While Intel still reported an operating loss of USD 3.1 billion, excluding approximately USD 4.1 billion in one-off items comprising Mobileye goodwill impairment and restructuring charges, adjusted operating income has in fact turned positive, reflecting a steady recovery in underlying profitability.

Management characterised this quarter's results as marking Intel's formal transition from "survival mode" to an "accelerated execution phase." On the outlook for DCAI, CEO Lip-Bu Tan noted that AI computing is rapidly shifting from training towards inference and agentic AI. Agentic AI places greater emphasis on compute efficiency, memory capacity, and orchestration — areas where CPUs excel — rather than pure GPU parallel compute throughput. This shift has driven the CPU-to-GPU compute ratio from 1:8 up to 1:4 or higher, significantly boosting demand for Intel's AI CPUs (see Chart 3). Supported by the resulting improvement in average selling prices, DCAI operating profit reached USD 1.5 billion, with an operating profit margin of 31%.

Chart 3: Average GPU to CPU Ratio in Hyperscale inference Clusters

On the other hand, Intel Foundry also showed a positive inflection. Although external customer revenue was only USD 140 million and is still at an early stage, it already points to decent growth visibility. Support from the Trump administration, together with Intel’s solid progress on its advanced 14A process — where yield and performance have already surpassed the level seen at the same stage of 18A — has been encouraging. The company is also working with multiple external customers on the Process Design Kit (PDK), and said it now has production commitments of up to USD 15 billion, providing the much-needed external orders that Foundry has lacked. In addition, the 18A process formally entered high-volume production this quarter, with yield improvement running faster than internal expectations at around 7-8% per month, easing market concerns over yield bottlenecks. As a result, foundry operating margin narrowed to 45% (2025 March :49%), and management expects the business to reach operating breakeven by 2027.

Taken together, management raised its Q2 revenue guidance to USD 13.8 billion-14.8 billion, indicating that the recovery in AI computing demand has translated into tangible momentum. Profitability also showed a clear rebound in the first quarter, strengthening market confidence in the company’s long-term credit quality.

Net Gearing Remains Low, Providing Adequate Buffer for Capital Expenditure

As of the end of March 2026, Intel held a total cash balance of USD 33 billion (comprising cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments), with total debt of approximately USD 45.0 billion, resulting in net debt of USD 12.2 billion — a YoY decline of 57% (see Table 1). Net gearing also fell back to a healthy level of 9.8% (end of March 2025: 27.3%). The improvement in net gearing was primarily driven by USD 8.9 billion in cash equity investment injected by the US government through the CHIPS Act, as well as USD 6.2 billion in cash proceeds from the divestment of equity stakes in semiconductor supplier Altera and the NAND memory business.

The market has expressed concern that Intel's recent acquisition of Ireland's Fab 34 for USD 14.2 billion (USD 7.7 billion in cash + USD 6.5 billion in newly issued debt), combined with the inability to generate positive free cash flow, raises questions about whether Intel can sustain a healthy level of debt. However, upon completion of the acquisition, net gearing is expected to return to approximately 21%, which remains within a reasonable range for the industry (see Table 1). At the same time, while interest coverage remains low, we believe free cash outflow will improve further this year as business conditions recover and Capex pressure gradually eases. At the current level of debt, Intel still has sufficient buffer capacity while awaiting free cash flow to turn positive.

Table 1: Intel Credit Metric

(USD billion)

End of 2025 March

End of 2026 March

After Fab 34 Acquisition

Total Debt

50

45

52

Cash and cash equivalents

9

17

10

Short-term investments

12

16

16

Cash Balance

21

33

25

Net Debt

29

12

27

Total stockholders' equity

106

125

125

Net Gearing

27.3%

9.8%

21.2%

Source: Company's report, iFast Compilations
Data as of 13 May 2026

Capital Expenditure Officially Retreating from Peak

Capex in 2025 declined sharply by 39% YoY to USD 14.6 billion — still at a relatively elevated level, but a clear retreat (see Chart 4). In tandem, cash flow from operating activities recovered by 17% YoY to USD 9.7 billion as operating losses narrowed, resulting in a significant 68% improvement in free cash outflow for 2025 to USD 4.95 billion. Entering the Q1 of 2026, Capex declined a further 30% to USD 3.6 billion, with free cash outflow narrowing again by 42% to USD 2.5 billion. Management’s Capex guidance for 2026 is for full-year spending to remain broadly flat YoY; excluding the one-off impact of the Fab 34 acquisition, 2026 adjusted free cash flow is expected to turn positive. Cash flow pressure is therefore believed to be gradually easing, providing support to the debt profile.

Chart 4: Intel’s free cash flow

Debt Maturity Profile is Well-Distributed

Intel's debt structure is predominantly long-term in nature, with nearly 80% of total debt maturing in 2030 or beyond (see Chart 5). Even after completion of the Fab 34 acquisition, Intel's remaining cash balance is sufficient to cover debt maturities over the next approximately ten years, indicating ample near-term liquidity. Management has committed to repaying all debt maturing in 2026 and 2027 on schedule, without the need for significant refinancing. This reflects management's determination to deleverage, and we believe debt levels will remain manageable over the medium term.

Chart 5: Intel’s debt distribution

Bond Investment

Overall, Intel’s credit profile is expected to remain stable, supported by its growth potential in AI and chip foundry businesses, as well as gradually improving cash flow and debt profile. Although near-term capex pressure still exists, the order backlog and progress with external foundry customers continue to support its debt-servicing capacity.

At present, the platform offers eight USD-denominated bonds issued by Intel. Both the issuer and the bonds carry BBB credit ratings (S&P / Fitch), placing them in the investment-grade category (see Table 2). Compared with similarly rated peers, Intel’s bonds offer yields to maturity that are reasonable compared with peers. Bonds with maturities of 6 to 10 years have better visibility and are suitable for investors seeking stable cash flow; longer-dated bonds carry greater uncertainty but offer a yield premium of around 10 to 20 basis points over peers, making them more suitable for investors who can tolerate some risk (see Chart 6).

Table 2: Intel’s Bonds

Bond

Tenor

Ask Price (Investor Buys)

Net Yield to Next Call

INTC 2.450% 15Nov2029 Corp (USD)

3.47

93.22

4.76

INTC 5.200% 10Feb2033 Corp (USD)

6.71

101.31

4.96

INTC 5.6250% 10Feb2043 Corp (USD)

16.72

97.48

5.87

INTC 4.900% 29Jul2045 Corp (USD)

19.20

86.10

6.28

INTC 4.900% 05Aug2052 Corp (USD)

26.21

84.65

6.09

INTC 5.700% 10Feb2053 Corp (USD)

26.73

94.68

6.11

INTC 5.600% 21Feb2054 Corp (USD)

27.76

94.15

6.04

INTC 3.200% 12Aug2061 Corp (USD)

35.23

58.44

6.09

Source: Bondsupermart, iFAST compilations. 
Data as of 28 May 2026


Chart 6: Intel’s yield curve V.S BBB area USD Bond yield curve
Risks
Although Intel has already shown signs of a turnaround and recovery, it still faces multiple significant risks, with the most central challenge coming from intensifying competition in the AI market. If competitors such as NVIDIA continue to dominate the GPU accelerator space, Intel’s Gaudi accelerators and Xeon CPUs may underperform expectations in the inference and agentic AI markets, which would directly weaken the growth momentum of the DCAI business and reduce visibility on external foundry orders for Intel Foundry, thereby slowing the recovery in overall revenue and cash flow.

Second, capital expenditure and process technology execution risks remain prominent. If the yield ramp of the advanced 18A process slows, or if production stability falls short of expectations, this would lead to higher idle capacity, greater depreciation pressure, delayed free cash flow breakeven, and potentially a higher EBITDA leverage ratio, increasing pressure on credit ratings.

In addition, geopolitical and supply chain risks cannot be ignored. Against the backdrop of US-China technology decoupling, although the U.S. government provides CHIPS Act subsidies and sovereign backing, policy changes or tighter export controls could still affect manufacturing costs and supply chain stability. A high debt burden also leaves the company highly sensitive to the interest-rate environment; if U.S. Treasury yields rise, bond prices would face significant downside risk.

Overall, Intel is in a high-risk transformation phase. Investors need to keep close watch on the AI competitive landscape, process progress, and macro interest-rate trends to assess the sustainability of its credit recovery more accurately.

Conclusion

Benefiting from strong AI computing demand, Intel’s 2025 DCAI revenue increased by 5% YoY to US$16.9 billion, Intel Foundry grew by 3% YoY to US$17.8 billion, total revenue was flat at US$52.9 billion, and operating losses narrowed significantly, indicating that the transformation is gradually taking effect.

Cash balance totalled US$33 billion, net gearing fell to 9.7%, debt maturities are reasonably staggered, short-term liquidity remains ample, and the credit base is still sound.

Among the dollar bonds available on the platform, Intel bonds offer net yields to maturity of 4.4% to 6.1%. Longer-dated bonds provide a clear spread pickup versus comparable peers, making them relatively attractive.










Declaration: For specific disclosure, at the time of publication of this report, IFPL (via its connected and associated entities) holds positions in INTC 5.6250% 10Feb2043 Corp (USD) , and the analyst who produced this report holds NIL positions in the abovementioned securities. This research report was prepared with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools. iFAST Financial Pte Ltd does not rely exclusively on AI for content generation; the content of this report – including all investment theses, ratings, price targets and conclusions – has been independently reviewed and verified by the research analyst(s) to ensure accuracy and professional integrity.



All materials and contents found in this site are strictly for general circulation and informational purposes only and should not be considered as an offer, or solicitation, to deal in any of the funds or products found/identified in this site. While iFAST Financial Pte Ltd ("IFPL") has tried to provide accurate and timely information, there may be inadvertent delays, omissions, technical or factual inaccuracies and typographical errors. Any opinion or estimate contained in this report is made on a general basis and neither IFPL nor any of its servants or agents have given any consideration to nor have they or any of them made any investigation of the investment objective, financial situation or particular need of any user or reader, any specific person or group of persons. You should consider carefully if the products you are going to purchase are suitable for your investment objective, investment experience, risk tolerance and other personal circumstances. If you are uncertain about the suitability of the investment product, please seek advice from a financial adviser, before making a decision to purchase the investment product. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The value of the investment products and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. In respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with the said research analyses or research reports, recipients of the report are to contact IFPL at 10 Collyer Quay, #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Building, Singapore 049315, or by telephone at +65 6557 2853. Where the report contains research analyses or research reports from a foreign research house and if the recipient of such research analyses or research reports is not an accredited investor, expert investor, institutional investor or an ex-accredited investor, IFPL accepts legal responsibility for the contents of such analyses or reports to such persons only to the extent as required by law. Please note that only certain security(ies) herein are available to all investors, while the rest are only available for certain persons to invest in, such as Accredited Investors (as defined in the Securities and Futures Act) or one who invests at least S$200,000 (or its equivalent currency) per transaction. To qualify as an Accredited Investor, one needs to submit a declaration form and certain relevant supporting documents, according to iFAST’s prevailing policies and procedures.

Please read our full disclaimers on the website at ( https://secure.fundsupermart.com/fsmone/policies/328125/investment-account-terms-&-conditions).

iFAST Financial Pte Ltd (IFPL) (registered address: 10 Collyer Quay #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Singapore 049315, Telephone: 6557 2000) holds the Financial Advisers Licence issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore ('MAS') to conduct regulated activities of advising on securities, marketing of collective investment schemes and arranging of any contract of insurance in respect of life policies, other than a contract of reinsurance and the Capital Markets Services Licence issued by the MAS to conduct regulated activities of dealing in securities and providing custodial services for securities. While IFPL has made every effort to ensure the independence of the report's contents, IFPL's nature of business is such that IFPL and its connected and associated entities together with their respective directors, officers and staff may be involved in providing dealing or investment-related services in the abovementioned securities, and have taken or may take positions in the securities mentioned in this report, and may also act as the principal for any buy or sell trades.