
DBS: Record wealth fees and stabilising net interest income support earnings generation
For the first quarter ending 31 March 2026 (1Q2026), DBS reported decent earnings: total income rose 1% YoY to S$5.9b, representing a new record. Net interest income (NII) declined 5% YoY to S$3.5b due to net interest margin (NIM) softening to 1.89% (1Q2025: 2.12%). However, this decline was more than compensated by a 14% YoY increase in non-interest income; in particular, wealth management remains the bright spot for DBS, surging 25% YoY to S$907m, continuing the 20+% Y/Y growth seen in the last four consecutive quarters. Operating expenses perked up slightly by 4% YoY, mainly due to an increase in staff costs, but this increase is more than offset by higher income, with its cost-to-income ratio declining 5bps to 39% compared to 4Q2025. The bank remains solidly profitable, with net profits inching up 1% YoY to S$2.9b.
Looking ahead, we expect DBS to continue posting resilient earnings. Our view is anchored by two main factors: 1) the compression in the bank’s NIM has possibly peaked, as a result of the shift in interest rate expectations due to the Middle East conflict, which would act as a tailwind for DBS’s NII business and 2) the continued momentum in its wealth management and institutional segments. We also note that DBS has minimal business exposure to the Middle East and the proactive approach undertaken by management in de-risking certain selective unsecured consumer and small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) portfolios.
Overall, the bank continues to maintain a strong investment-grade credit profile, being rated AA- (S&P), Aa1 (Moody’s), and AA- (Fitch). Looking at the balance sheet, we still think DBS has a solid portfolio of assets, as seen in its 1.0% non-performing loan (NPL) ratio, which has remained constant across the last four quarters. Since spiking to 36 bps (due to a one-off downgrade of a single, previously watch-listed real estate exposure in Hong Kong), we are heartened to see its loan-loss provision reverting to 15 bps, in line with its average quarterly provision. Solvency and liquidity buffers remain robust with a fully phased-in CET1 ratio of 14.8%, which exceeds both regulatory requirement of 9.2%, and management’s explicit target of 13% to 15%. We also point out the bank’s healthy net stable funding ratio (NSFR) of 117% and liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) of 151%, both comfortably above the regulatory requirement of 100%. DBS’s leverage ratio remains low at 5.9%. These healthy leverage and coverage metrics provide a solid buffer against short-term shocks and long-term funding disruptions. Overall, we expect DBS to maintain its strong credit profile.
While DBS has several outstanding issues, two stand out in our view. The DBSSP 3.989% 28Aug2028 Corp (USD) offers a fair yield-to-worst of 4.30% over a short 2.26-year tenor. For investors seeking a higher pickup in yield spread, the DBSSP 5.065% 13Feb2031 Corp (AUD) delivers a yield-to-worst of 5.19% across 4.73 years to maturity, representing a decent 60+bps pickup over comparable Australian sovereigns. Both offer a way to lock in high-quality income from a household name.
Table 1: About DBS’s bonds
|
Issue |
Issuer |
Ask Price |
Years to Maturity |
Yield to Worst (%) |
Credit Rating (S&P / Moody ‘s / Fitch) |
|
DBS Bank Ltd |
99.33 |
2.26 |
4.30% |
- / Aaa / AAA |
|
|
DBS Bank Ltd / Australia Branch |
99.61 |
4.72 |
5.16% |
- / Aa1 / AA- |
|
|
Source: Bloomberg, Bondsupermart, iFAST compilations. Data as of 26 May 2026 |
|||||
OCBC: Better than expected profitability
OCBC reported a steady set of results for their first quarter ending 31 March 2026 (1Q26). Net profit of S$2.0b improved 5% YoY and 13% QoQ, underpinned by record quarterly total income of S$3.8b. Like DBS, OCBC's NII softened (-5% YoY) on the back of a declining NIM (1.76%, down 28bps YoY) amid lower SGD, HKD and USD benchmark rates. However, this was more than offset by a 23% YoY surge in non-interest income, spearheaded by broad-based strength across wealth fees (+34% YoY), trading income (+10% YoY) and insurance income from its Great Eastern arm (+34% YoY). Operating efficiency improved, with the cost-to-income ratio coming in at 39.3% (vs. 43.1% in 4Q25).
Looking ahead, OCBC management struck a more guarded tone this quarter, flagging geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and ongoing trade tariff uncertainty as key headwinds. That said, its loan growth of 9% YoY (constant currency) should help cushion compressed net interest margins, while steady contributions from wealth management and Great Eastern's insurance arm should continue to support earnings. Additionally, we flag out the recently announced acquisition of HSBC's wealth business in Indonesia should be accretive to assets under management (AUM) and current account & savings account (CASA) balances, further reinforcing the non-interest income engine. Like DBS, we find comfort in OCBC's ability to grow its non-interest operating segments and the income contribution from Great Eastern's strong insurance presence.
Overall, OCBC maintains a strong investment-grade credit profile, with credit ratings of AA- (S&P), Aa1 (Moody's), and AA- (Fitch Rating). Asset quality remains a core strength, evidenced by a stable 0.9% NPL ratio (unchanged for eight consecutive quarters) and a manageable loan-loss rate of 23 bps. The bank's solvency and liquidity buffers remain robust. The fully phased-in CET1 ratio of 15.2%, comfortably surpasses both regulatory requirements (9.0%) and management's internal target of 14%. This capital strength is complemented by a healthy 7.0% leverage ratio, strong liquidity coverage (138%) and NSFR (113%). Overall, we expect OCBC’s credit profile to be maintained moving forward, with these healthy leverage and coverage ratios providing ample headroom to deal with macroeconomic volatility.
Looking at OCBC’s outstanding bonds (Table 2 below), a handful of issues catch our eye. The USD bullets offer yields-to-worst between 4.6% and 4.9% across a 1.05 to 3.39-year call window, providing decent income to investors on a shorter timeframe. For SGD investors, the OCBCSP 4.050% Perpetual Corp (SGD) offers a yield to worst of 2.73%, with 3.39 years to call.
Table 2: About OCBC’s bonds
|
Issue |
Issuer |
Ask Price |
Years to Call |
Yield to Worst (%) |
Credit Rating (S&P / Moody ‘s / Fitch) |
|
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited |
99.95 |
1.05 |
4.65% |
BBB+ / A2 / A |
|
|
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited |
98.55 |
4.29 |
4.93% |
BBB+ / A2 / A |
|
|
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited |
104.30 |
3.39 |
2.73% |
BBB- / Baa1 / BBB+ |
|
|
Source: Bloomberg, Bondsupermart, iFAST compilations. Data as of 26 May 2026 |
|||||
UOB: Steadying the ship with credit cost normalisation
Unlike DBS and OCBC, UOB reported a softer set of results for their first quarter ending 31 March 2026 (1Q26). Net profit of S$1.4b edged up 2% QoQ but eased 4% YoY, reflecting a more subdued operating environment compared to the other two banks. NII slipped 1% QoQ (-4% YoY) on the back of a narrower NIM (1.82%, down 18 bps YoY), even as loan growth held steady at 4% YoY. Fee income offered some support, growing 2% QoQ to S$637m on wealth and capital market momentum, though we note this segment remained 8% below last year’s record high as investment banking and loan-related activities softened. Despite the softer revenue mix, the cost-to-income ratio improved to 44.5% (from 46.4% in 4Q25), though it sits modestly higher than the 42.6% recorded a year ago, reflecting continued cost discipline against a softer income base.
Looking ahead, UOB's management is cautiously optimistic on 2026, anchored by its diversified ASEAN franchise and ongoing momentum in CASA, wealth, cards and loans. Deeper relationships across its enlarged ASEAN customer base — particularly in Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, and Vietnam — should continue to underpin growth, while ecosystem partnerships are expected to open new revenue streams. That said, management acknowledges that global uncertainty remains elevated, suggesting that near-term performance will likely track the broader regional risk environment.
Despite the softer financial results, UOB maintains a strong investment-grade credit profile, with credit ratings of AA- (S&P), Aa1 (Moody's), and AA- (Fitch Rating). Encouragingly, asset quality has actually firmed up year-on-year — the NPL ratio improved to 1.5% (from 1.6% in 1Q25) and held stable QoQ, while credit costs normalised to 26 bps, well below the elevated 134bps recorded in 3Q25 when management front-loaded pre-emptive allowances for US and China property exposures, and also lower than the 35bps in 1Q25. We think this quarter could suggest the worst of the prior provisioning cycle is firmly in the rear-view mirror.
The bank's solvency and liquidity buffers remain healthy. The fully phased-in CET1 ratio stood at 15.2%, improving 0.3 percentage point (ppt) QoQ but tracking 0.2ppt below the 15.4% recorded in 1Q25, and comfortably above both the 9.0% regulatory requirement and management's 13.5% target. Supporting metrics paint a similarly reassuring picture: leverage ratio at 7.0% (compared to 7.3% in 1Q25), LCR at 144% and a NSFR of 115%, collectively provide UOB with sufficient headroom to navigate market dislocations and sustain stable funding access through the cycle. Hence, we remain comfortable with the bank’s credit profile and do not expect any material weakening.
Rounding out the picks with UOB (Table 3 below), two segments stand out: the bank's Australian bullet and its outstanding SGD perpetuals. The UOBSP 5.023% 29Jan2031 Corp (AUD) delivers a yield-to-worst of 5.18% over a 4.68-year tenor, picking up a respectable 60+bps spread over comparable Australian sovereigns. For SGD investors, the UOBSP 4.250% Perpetual Corp (SGD) offers a 2.67% yield-to-worst with just 1.36 years to call. An alternative SGD perpetual stretches further out the curve, yielding 3.08% to worst with 6.66 years to call, for investors comfortable with the longer call window.
Table 3: About UOB’s bonds
|
Issue |
Issuer |
Ask Price |
Years to Call |
Yield to Worst (%) |
Credit Rating (S&P / Moody ‘s / Fitch) |
|
United Overseas Bank Limited (UOB) |
102.25 |
1.36 |
2.67% |
BBB- / Baa1 / BBB+ |
|
|
United Overseas Bank Limited (UOB) |
99.58 |
6.66 |
3.08% |
- / Baa1 / BBB+ |
|
|
United Overseas Bank Ltd, Sydney Branch |
99.24 |
4.68 |
5.21% |
AA- / Aa1 / AA- |
|
|
Source: Bloomberg, Bondsupermart, iFAST compilations. Data as of 26 May 2026 |
|||||
Declaration: For specific disclosure, at the time of publication of this report, IFPL (via its connected and associated entities) holds positions in all of the abovementioned securities, and the analyst who produced this report holds NIL positions in the abovementioned securities. This research report was prepared with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools. iFAST Financial Pte Ltd does not rely exclusively on AI for content generation; the content of this report – including all investment theses, ratings, price targets and conclusions – has been independently reviewed and verified by the research analyst(s) to ensure accuracy and professional integrity.
