China has two AI trades right now. Here is why both are worth owning.

A-share hardware tech is up 47% this year while Hong Kong platform tech is down 17% — but the gap is not a verdict on which market is winning. It is a snapshot of two completely different AI stories at two completely different points in their cycle, and right now, both have meaningful upside ahead.

Laven Cao, CFA
Laven Cao, CFA25 Jun 2026 6 Views
China has two AI trades right now. Here is why both are worth owning.

  • 159939 is up 47% because its hardware companies are receiving real AI infrastructure orders — all 158 index constituents reported net profit growth of 74% year-on-year in 1Q2026.


  • US chip export restrictions are accelerating domestic procurement, creating a second, policy-backed growth engine inside 159939 that does not depend on overseas spending cycles.

  • Our target for 159939 is 17,224 points (~37% upside); our target for 3067 is 7,706 points (~67% upside), with the larger discount reflecting temporary headwinds, not weaker fundamentals.

  • We recommend equal-weight exposure to both ETFs as the most complete way to capture China's AI opportunity across hardware delivery and platform recovery.

  • 3067 is down 17% due to a food delivery price war that is now ending, not because its core businesses — Tencent at 43% operating margin, Alibaba Cloud up 40% — have deteriorated.

There are two ways to invest in China’s technology sector.

The first is through A-share hardware companies — the businesses that manufacture the chips, servers and components that AI runs on. These are listed on China’s mainland stock exchanges and captured by the CSI All-Share Information Technology ETF (SZSE:159939).

The second is through Hong Kong-listed platform companies — businesses like Tencent, Alibaba and Meituan that billions of people use every day, and that are investing heavily in AI to grow their services. These are captured by the iShares Hang Seng TECH ETF (HKEX:3067).

This year, one is up 47%. The other is down 17%. Most investors look at that and assume one is a good investment and the other is not.

That is not what is happening. The two ETFs have moved in different directions for completely different reasons. And right now, both are worth owning.

Here is why.

Why one went up and the other went down

The world is in the middle of a historic spending boom on AI infrastructure. Google, Amazon, Microsoft and Meta are expected to spend around USD 725 billion building data centres in 2026 alone — 77% more than last year. Someone has to make the components that go into all of that. A large portion of those orders are landing with Chinese hardware companies. Orders have arrived. Profits have followed.

Those are the companies inside 159939. That is why it is up 47%.

3067 is a different story. Its biggest holdings — Tencent, Alibaba and Meituan — are not selling to data centres. They are consumer and platform businesses. Earlier this year, Meituan, Alibaba and JD.com were all offering heavy discounts to steal food delivery customers from each other. That cost them a lot of money and their profits collapsed. On top of that, all three are spending heavily on AI development right now, which is an additional drag on near-term earnings.

That is why 3067 is down 17%.

What is inside each ETF

Most investors still associate “China tech” with large platform companies such as Tencent, Alibaba and Meituan. But the companies doing the physical work of building China’s AI infrastructure are mostly listed on mainland exchanges, not in Hong Kong. This is where 159939 offers a very different exposure.

159939 is highly concentrated in the “hard” end of the technology value chain. Around 85% of the portfolio is invested in businesses that make the physical components behind AI infrastructure — chips, circuit boards, servers, optical components and related hardware. By sub-sector, around 35% of the fund is exposed to semiconductors and equipment, 31% to electronic equipment and components, 22% to technology hardware, and only 12% to software and IT services.

Its holdings span three layers of the AI supply chain. At the upstream computing layer, companies such as Cambricon and Hygon Information benefit from two tailwinds: growing demand for chips that run AI models locally, and Chinese companies being required to buy domestic chips instead of imported ones as US export restrictions tighten. At the midstream infrastructure layer, companies such as Foxconn Industrial Internet and Victory Giant Technology directly receive data centre capex orders. At the downstream software layer, companies such as iFLYTEK and Yonyou Network stand to benefit gradually as AI-native applications become more widely adopted and monetised.

In simple terms, Hygon Information makes domestic chips to replace imported ones, Cambricon designs AI processors, Foxconn Industrial Internet assembles AI servers, and Victory Giant Technology supplies high-end printed circuit boards used in AI servers. This makes 159939 one of the more direct ways to invest in the production side of China’s AI buildout.

3067 is mostly made up of platform and consumer businesses. Tencent and Alibaba are the two larger holdings. Meituan — China’s dominant food delivery app — is another major position. So is BYD, the electric vehicle maker.

These companies serve hundreds of millions of Chinese consumers every day. Their AI story is different from 159939 — they are not benefiting from infrastructure spending today, but they are investing in AI now so that their businesses become more valuable over the next few years.

159939: The results are already in

We do not need to speculate about whether 159939’s companies are benefiting from AI. The first-quarter 2026 results are confirmed.

All 158 companies in the index reported. Their combined revenue grew 20.7% compared to a year ago. Their combined net profit grew 74.1%. Profits grew nearly four times as fast as revenue — the strongest quarter in nearly two years.

Two things are driving this.

The first is global AI spending. Foxconn Industrial Internet assembles AI servers and its profit grew 102% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2026. Its orders are contracted and visible well into the future.

The second is China replacing foreign chips with domestic ones. The US has restricted the sale of advanced chips to China. The unintended consequence is that Chinese companies now have to buy domestic chips instead — guaranteed demand for companies like Hygon Information. Hygon has grown its profits between 20% and 75% every quarter for several consecutive quarters.

These two engines reinforce each other. Global AI spending keeps hardware orders coming. US restrictions keep domestic chip demand high. Both are growing at the same time.

3067: The bad news is almost over

3067’s difficult year comes down to two things, both of which are temporary.

The first is the food delivery price war. Meituan, Alibaba and JD.com were all heavily subsidising customers to take business from each other. The cost showed up directly in earnings: Meituan went from profit to loss, Alibaba’s profit fell 95% year-on-year, and JD.com’s fell 39%.

The second is a headwind faced by consumer technology and electric vehicle segments. In 2025, the Chinese government offered generous incentives — discounts on electric vehicles, subsidies on consumer electronics, trade-in schemes — that drove an unusually strong year of sales. Companies naturally reported strong earnings that year. When those incentives ended entering 2026, sales came off their peak and earnings comparisons turned unfavourable. The businesses have not gotten worse. The bar they are being compared against got higher.

Now look at what is happening underneath those numbers.

Tencent’s core business is operating at a 43% profit margin — once you strip out what it is spending on AI development. Alibaba Cloud grew revenue 40% year-on-year and its AI-specific revenue grew tenfold in just six months. These are not struggling companies. They are companies going through a short-term earnings dip while building something that will generate returns for years.

And the food delivery war is ending. All three platforms have publicly signalled they are pulling back on subsidies. Their losses in that segment narrowed sharply from late 2025 into the first quarter of 2026.

The market noticed. In early June 2026, the Hang Seng TECH Index jumped 4.72% in a single day. Tencent rose more than 10%. Meituan and Alibaba gained between 6% and 9%. That is investors concluding that the worst is behind them.

What the numbers say

Based on our earnings forecasts, 159939 has a target index level of 17,224 points — around 37% above where it trades today. That assumes the hardware order cycle continues and earnings keep coming in as expected.

For 3067, our target is 7,706 points — around 67% above current levels. The larger potential gain reflects how deeply the index has been sold off. The businesses inside it have not become less valuable. They have had a difficult few months for specific, temporary reasons. Once those reasons fade, the gap between price and value should close.

Table 1: Hang Seng Tech Index earnings forecast

Hang Seng Tech Index

FY25

FY26E

FY27E

FY28E

PE Ratio (X)

18.3

17.8

15.4

13.4

Earnings Growth

2.8%

2.6%

15.8%

14.6%

Earnings Per Share

251.54

258.08

298.86

342.49

Target Price (HKD)

 

 

 

7,706

(Based on fair PE ratio of 22.5X)

Upside Potential

 

 

 

67%

Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P., iFAST Estimates

Data as of 18 June 2026

Table 2: CSI All-Share IT Index earnings forecast

CSI All-Share Info Tech Index

FY25

FY26E

FY27E

FY28E

PE Ratio (X)

68.0

59.0

48.0

40.0

Earnings Growth

44.9%

70.0%

23.0%

20.0%

Target Price (CNY)

 

 

 

17,224

(Based on fair PE ratio of 55X)

 

Upside Potential

 

 

 

37%

Source: Wind, iFAST Estimates

Data as of 18 June 2026

What could go wrong

If China’s macro recovery falls short of expectations, weak consumer could affect demand for electric vehicles and consumer electronics, reducing the earnings upside for related technology sectors.

The US could tighten technology restrictions further, which would hurt hardware supply chains inside 159939.

For 3067, the central risk is timing. The food delivery price war between Meituan, Alibaba and JD.com is showing signs of ending — but if competition persists longer than expected, the earnings recovery that underpins the 67% upside target will take longer to materialise.

Singapore-based investors also face currency risk — movements in the Chinese yuan and Hong Kong dollar against the Singapore dollar affect your actual returns. And 159939’s target assumes hardware orders keep arriving — if major customers pull back, that changes the picture.

Our recommendation: own both

159939 gives you access to AI earnings that are already happening. The orders are in and the quarterly results confirm it.

3067 gives you access to the recovery that has not happened yet. The platforms are in better shape than their recent results suggest, the food delivery headwinds are fading, and the AI investments they are making now will show up as revenue and profit over the next two to three years.

One without the other is an incomplete picture of China’s AI opportunity. We suggest holding both in equal measure.

For investors who want to go one step further and capture the full AI value chain — beyond information technology into the physical infrastructure that makes AI possible at scale — T. Rowe Price Funds SICAV – China Evolution Equity Fund offers a complementary angle worth considering.

Training large AI models is enormously energy-intensive. Data centres require not only chips and servers, but reliable, high-capacity power supply — a bottleneck increasingly recognised as a binding constraint on AI expansion globally. This creates investment opportunities across power equipment, grid infrastructure, and industrial machinery that sit upstream of the IT sector, and are not captured by a pure information technology index.

With 30.2% of its portfolio in Industrials and Business Services — more than three times its benchmark weight of 9.5% — the T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund is deliberately positioned to capture this layer. Holdings such as Weichai Power illustrate how the AI opportunity extends beyond semiconductors and software into the broader industrial and energy stack.

Taken together, 159939, 3067, and the T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund represent three distinct but mutually reinforcing layers of China's AI opportunity: hardware delivery, ecosystem monetisation, and physical infrastructure. Investors seeking the most complete expression of this theme may find value in holding all three.

Declaration

For specific disclosure, at the time of publication of this report, IFPL, through its connected and associated entities, and the analyst who produced this report hold a NIL position in the abovementioned securities.

This research report was prepared with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools. iFAST Financial Pte Ltd does not rely exclusively on AI for content generation. The content of this report, including all investment theses, ratings, price targets and conclusions, has been independently reviewed and verified by the research analyst(s) to ensure accuracy and professional integrity.

Investors should note that ETF investments are subject to market risk, sector concentration risk, currency risk and valuation risk. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Investors should consider whether the product is suitable for their investment objectives, financial situation and risk tolerance.

All materials and contents found in this site are strictly for general circulation and informational purposes only and should not be considered as an offer, or solicitation, to deal in any of the funds or products found/identified in this site. While iFAST Financial Pte Ltd ("IFPL") has tried to provide accurate and timely information, there may be inadvertent delays, omissions, technical or factual inaccuracies and typographical errors. Any opinion or estimate contained in this report is made on a general basis and neither IFPL nor any of its servants or agents have given any consideration to nor have they or any of them made any investigation of the investment objective, financial situation or particular need of any user or reader, any specific person or group of persons. You should consider carefully if the products you are going to purchase are suitable for your investment objective, investment experience, risk tolerance and other personal circumstances. If you are uncertain about the suitability of the investment product, please seek advice from a financial adviser, before making a decision to purchase the investment product. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The value of the investment products and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. In respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with the said research analyses or research reports, recipients of the report are to contact IFPL at 10 Collyer Quay, #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Building, Singapore 049315, or by telephone at +65 6557 2853. Where the report contains research analyses or research reports from a foreign research house and if the recipient of such research analyses or research reports is not an accredited investor, expert investor, institutional investor or an ex-accredited investor, IFPL accepts legal responsibility for the contents of such analyses or reports to such persons only to the extent as required by law. Please note that only certain security(ies) herein are available to all investors, while the rest are only available for certain persons to invest in, such as Accredited Investors (as defined in the Securities and Futures Act) or one who invests at least S$200,000 (or its equivalent currency) per transaction. To qualify as an Accredited Investor, one needs to submit a declaration form and certain relevant supporting documents, according to iFAST’s prevailing policies and procedures.

Please read our full disclaimers on the website at ( https://secure.fundsupermart.com/fsmone/policies/328125/investment-account-terms-&-conditions).

iFAST Financial Pte Ltd (IFPL) (registered address: 10 Collyer Quay #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Singapore 049315, Telephone: 6557 2000) holds the Financial Advisers Licence issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore ('MAS') to conduct regulated activities of advising on securities, marketing of collective investment schemes and arranging of any contract of insurance in respect of life policies, other than a contract of reinsurance and the Capital Markets Services Licence issued by the MAS to conduct regulated activities of dealing in securities and providing custodial services for securities. While IFPL has made every effort to ensure the independence of the report's contents, IFPL's nature of business is such that IFPL and its connected and associated entities together with their respective directors, officers and staff may be involved in providing dealing or investment-related services in the abovementioned securities, and have taken or may take positions in the securities mentioned in this report, and may also act as the principal for any buy or sell trades.