Don't panic: Singapore's LNG shock is real, but so is the investment case

• Qatar's force majeure and the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz represent a direct, concurrent supply shock — not a tail risk, but the current operating reality for global LNG markets.

• Singapore's structural vulnerability is real: 94% of electricity comes from imported gas, and Qatar accounted for 47% of the seaborne LNG basket under a 2023 long-term contract.

• Four physical buffers: strategic reserves, uninterrupted pipeline flows, GasCo's centralised procurement, and dual-fuel generation materially reduce the risk of a physical supply crisis.

• The re-rating catalysts for Singapore equities remain intact, while the banking sector is likely to see an acceleration in wealth inflows.

• Maintain positive stance on Singapore equities; the shock changes the near-term cost environment, not the structural investment thesis.

The Middle East conflict has escalated into a direct supply shock. The attack on Qatar’s Ras Laffan Industrial City, a facility accounting for roughly 20% of global LNG supply, has led QatarEnergy to declare force majeure. At the same time, the Strait of Hormuz, through which around 25% of seaborne oil and 19% of global LNG trade flows, is effectively closed. This is no longer a tail risk that has materialised. It is the current operating reality.

Singapore sits directly within the transmission channel. The economy generates around 94% of its electricity from imported natural gas and has no domestic energy supply, leaving it structurally exposed to imported price volatility. The question is not whether Singapore will feel the impact, but whether this shock meaningfully changes the investment case.

Our view is that it does not. Near-term inflationary pressure and cost headwinds will emerge, but the broader earnings resilience of Singapore equities remains intact. We maintain our positive stance on the market.

The exposure is real, and the cost shock is already arriving

In 2025, around 43% of Singapore’s gas supply came via pipelines from Malaysia and Indonesia; the remaining 57% was delivered as seaborne LNG. Within that LNG mix, Qatar accounted for approximately 47% under a long-term contract signed in 2023, Australia supplied an estimated 31%, while the US contributed around 9%.

Figure 1: Qatar's outsized share makes the supply shock immediate

The Qatari disruption is therefore material. Pipeline gas, which accounts for 43% of total supply, remains unaffected by the Strait of Hormuz closure, but it cannot fully offset the loss of flexible seaborne volumes. The situation is compounded by concurrent tightness elsewhere. Cyclone Narelle disrupted production across Western Australia on 27 March, affecting Woodside’s North West Shelf and Chevron’s Gorgon and Wheatstone plants, while Santos’ Barossa project remains offline. These disruptions are temporary, but they further constrain an already tight global LNG market.

The adjustment is more likely to come through prices rather than volumes. Energy costs account for 76% of Singapore’s regulated electricity tariff, which is reset quarterly. During the 2022 energy shock, tariffs rose around 40% higher than pre-crisis levels. The April 2026 revision reflects this trend, with overall electricity tariffs, before GST and across all user groups, increasing by an average of 2% quarter-on-quarter.

The macro transmission is direct. Higher tariffs feed into transport, logistics, and industrial production costs. Energy-intensive sectors face the most immediate margin compression.

Singapore’s defences are active, and the system has multiple buffers

Despite the scale of the shock, Singapore’s energy system is not operating without protection, and the defensive posture is meaningfully stronger than it was during the 2021–22 crisis.

On the physical side, strategic LNG and diesel reserves remain fully intact, while pipeline gas from Malaysia and Indonesia continues to flow uninterrupted. In addition, Singapore benefits from GasCo, the centralised state gas buyer that became operational in January 2026, providing a single, coordinated point of procurement control that did not exist in 2021. There is also dual-fuel infrastructure in place, ensuring every generation unit can switch between gas and diesel under EMA-mandated readiness testing.

The regulatory and fiscal framework further reinforces these buffers. The EMA’s 80% hedging requirement, introduced in August 2023 following the exit of four electricity retailers, has reduced retail-level price transmission. On the fiscal side, Budget 2026 provides up to SGD 570 in U-Save rebates for eligible HDB households, roughly 1.5 times the usual annual allocation. Prime Minister Lawrence Wong confirmed on 18 March that additional fiscal capacity remains available. Singapore entered 2026 with an SGD 10.5 billion budget surplus, equivalent to 1.3% of GDP, reinforcing that policy capacity is not only intact, but actively deployed.

Safe haven and capital magnet: why global uncertainty works in Singapore’s favour

The historical relationship between energy shocks and Singapore markets provides an important anchor. Over the past two decades, Asian LNG import prices and Singapore’s wholesale electricity price (USEP) have moved broadly in tandem through every major global disruption. Yet Singapore equities have not followed the same path. The STI remained resilient through the 2021–22 LNG price surge and continued trending higher thereafter. The key distinction is that energy cost shocks transmit into household tariffs, not equity market earnings trajectories in a sustained way. The decoupling between energy volatility and equity returns is well established in Singapore’s market history.

Figure 2: Energy prices spike but Singapore market does not follow

*STI Price scaled by 1/10 for display.

The same shock that pressures energy costs simultaneously drives capital toward Singapore.  The SGD is increasingly regarded as a regional safe-haven currency, having appreciated against major currencies through 2025’s volatility. MAS’s exchange rate-based policy framework further moderates the domestic pass-through of imported energy costs: a stronger SGD means Singapore effectively pays less in local-currency terms for each dollar-denominated LNG cargo. Wealth inflows into Singapore’s banking system remain robust and are well positioned to accelerate as global uncertainty drives capital reallocation. The current crisis is more likely to reinforce these inflows rather than reverse them.

Related articles: Singapore: STI to hit near 6,000 by the end of 2028, alongside an annual dividend yield of 5%

Singapore banks: Updated target price supports our top pick for DBS

Energy-linked equities: structurally insulated, not structurally exposed

The intuitive view is that higher energy prices should mechanically pressure local utilities and infrastructure names. In practice, long-dated contracts, regulated pass-through frameworks, and order books secured before the current escalation collectively buffer the earnings base across the sector.

Sembcorp Industries (SGX: U96) illustrates this clearly. While it operates gas-fired generation in Singapore, 98% of output is sold under long-term offtake agreements, with more than 60% secured beyond five years. These contracts lock in the spread between fuel costs and electricity revenue, insulating earnings from spot LNG volatility. Medium-term growth is instead driven by a 17 GW renewables portfolio across various countries, alongside a 600 MW hydrogen-ready plant due by end-2026, where elevated fossil fuel prices are supportive rather than detrimental.

Keppel Infrastructure Trust (SGX: A7RU) sits at the most defensive end. Its contract structures largely remove direct exposure to fuel price movements. City Energy passes through gas cost increases to end-users under a regulated framework, while the Keppel Merlimau Cogen Plant receives fixed capacity payments under a tolling agreement extended to 2040. Beyond Singapore, KIT also holds a long-term lease on the Aramco Gas Pipelines Company — a contracted Saudi Arabia-based infrastructure asset that provides income with minimum volume protection through 2042, adding geographic diversification to the trust's defensive cash flow base. At the same time, City Energy continues to benefit from organic demand growth driven by expanding commercial activity and rising data centre energy needs.

Even though none of these names are immune to a severe and prolonged disruption, their earnings are not driven by spot LNG pricing. That structural separation between commodity volatility and cash flow generation is what allows this segment of the market to remain stable in the current environment.

Stay the course on Singapore

The April 2026 electricity tariff revision is set to come in higher. Energy-intensive sectors are expected to face margin compression, while headline inflation will edge up in the near term. These are tangible headwinds and should not be understated.

But they do not alter the structural investment thesis for Singapore equities. The key re-rating drivers — namely the Equity Market Development Programme (EQDP), a MAS-backed initiative to improve Singapore-listed companies' valuations and market liquidity, and the broader Value Unlock Package — remain firmly in place. Banking sector fundamentals continue to be supported by sustained wealth inflows and stabilising net interest margins. At the index level, Singapore equities offer an attractive dividend yield relative to regional peers, reinforcing their defensive appeal in a volatile macro environment.

Singapore’s resilience has never been defined by the absence of shocks, but by its capacity to absorb and transmit them more effectively than its peers. The current energy disruption is a test of that framework. On balance, Singapore continues to pass it.

Applying our 15X fair value P/E to projected 2028E EPS, we derive an end-2028 target of 5,968 for the Straits Times Index. This implies 20.3% price upside from 1 April 2026, with an additional annual dividend yield of around 4.8% over three years. 

Table 1: STI’s earnings table

STI	2025	2026E	2027E	2028E
PE Ratio (X)	15.2	14.6	13.6	12.5
Earnings growth (YoY%)	6.2%	11.9%	7.3%	9.0%
Projected Earnings Per Share (EPS)	305.0	341.3	366.2	399.1
Forward Dividend Yield (%)	4.67%	4.65%	4.84%	4.92%
Target Price (Based on 15X fair P/E Ratio)				5,987
Upside Potential (%)				20.3%
Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P., iFAST Estimates Data as of 1 April 2026

Figure 3: STI’s price vs EPS

For investors seeking exposure to Singapore’s equity market, we continue to recommend positioning through the Amova Singapore Dividend Equity SGD Fund, the Amova Singapore STI ETF (SGX: G3B), and the LionGlobal Singapore Trust Fund for broader exposure.

Exposure	Recommended Product
Singapore	Amova Singapore Dividend Equity SGD Fund Amova Singapore STI ETF (SGX: G3B)
EQDP (higher SMID exposure)	LionGlobal Singapore Trust Fund

Declaration:

For specific disclosure, at the time of publication of this report, IFPL (via its connected and associated entities) and the analyst who produced this report hold a NIL position in the abovementioned securities.

This research report was prepared with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools. iFAST Financial Pte Ltd does not rely exclusively on AI for content generation; the content of this report – including all investment theses, ratings, price targets and conclusions – has been independently reviewed and verified by the research analyst(s) to ensure accuracy and professional integrity.