
Key Points
Click here to view our inaugural ETF booklet, or click here to view our ETF Focus list.
- In this year’s edition of our ETF Focus List, there are a total of 18 changes, consisting of additions and removals of some sub-categories.
- Amid President Donald Trump’s renewed tariff push, we have removed US Value, US Banks, and US Consumer Staples from our focus list to avoid sectors more susceptible to macroeconomic headwinds and to concentrate on higher-conviction areas such as tech.
- We have reinstated China Tech and China Electric Vehicles in our “Tactical Plays” category, reflecting a more constructive view on China that is supported by improving macro conditions, stronger policy backing, and rapid advancements in AI.
- We have added Europe Defence to our “Tactical Plays” category, as the region pushes for military autonomy in response to waning US support and mounting pressure from Trump for NATO allies to increase defence spending.
- For India exposure, we recommend the Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF (LSE:XCS5) for its low 0.19% expense ratio and ability to avoid India’s capital gains tax, which can significantly erode returns in physical ETFs.
- For Latin America exposure, we recommend the iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (LSE:DLTM) for its low 0.20% expense ratio and favourable 15% withholding tax due to its Irish domicile.
With over 8,700 ETFs available on our platform, choosing the right one for your portfolio can be overwhelming—especially for those new to investing. To help investors sift through the vast number of options across different exchanges, we launched our ETF Focus List in 2018 with the goal of spotlighting the best-in-class ETFs across global equity and fixed income markets.
The ETFs on our Focus List are selected based on a set of quantitative and qualitative factors. The quantitative factors include expense ratio, liquidity, and tracking difference, while the qualitative factors encompass the underlying index, ETF structure, and withholding tax implications.
Our ETF Focus List is updated annually to ensure that our recommendations remain relevant and up to date for investors. For 2025, we refreshed the list with 18 changes.
Removed US Value, US Banks and US Consumer Staples
The Trump administration’s attempt to “Make America Great Again” has created havoc across the globe, threatening to reignite inflation, slow economic growth, and weigh on corporate earnings.
In such uncertain times, it is important for investors to be selective and focus on sectors that are resilient to macroeconomic headwinds. The digital economy and semiconductors are two sectors we believe will thrive over the long term, regardless of tariffs. The earnings of companies in these sectors are driven by structural trends such as artificial intelligence (AI) and digitalisation, which continue to fuel sustained demand for their products and services.
Moreover, leading players in these industries boast robust balance sheets, giving them the financial strength to weather short-term declines in cash flow and earnings. Apart from hardware-focused companies like Apple, most tech firms have limited exposure to tariffs due to their minimal reliance on physical goods.
Given our strong conviction in the long-term prospects of the tech sector, we have decided to remove the US Value category. Value funds tend to be significantly underweight in tech relative to the S&P 500, while maintaining heavier exposure to sectors such as Financials, Industrials, Energy, Healthcare, Consumer Staples, and Utilities (Table 1).
Table 1: Sector comparison between VTV and VOO
|
Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF (NYSE: VTV) |
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSE: VOO) |
|
|
Communication Services |
3.70% |
9.30% |
|
Consumer Discretionary |
8.70% |
10.40% |
|
Consumer Staples |
9.80% |
6.20% |
|
Energy |
6.50% |
3.20% |
|
Financials |
22.80% |
14.40% |
|
Health Care |
15.60% |
10.80% |
|
Industrials |
15.30% |
8.50% |
|
Information Technology |
6.00% |
30.40% |
|
Materials |
2.40% |
2.00% |
|
Real Estate |
3.10% |
2.30% |
|
Utilities |
6.10% |
2.60% |
|
Source: Vanguard website. Data as of 30 April 2025. |
||
Under our base case scenario of mild stagflation in the US, assuming elevated tariffs persist, we expect the banking sector to come under significant pressure both in terms of profitability and credit quality. While banks do not earn revenue directly from physical goods, they remain exposed to the broader impact of an economic slowdown. We foresee weaker loan growth as consumer and business spending contracts, and a notable decline in investment banking and private equity activity due to diminished market confidence. Therefore, we have decided to remove US Banks from “Tactical Plays”.
While US Consumer Staples are traditionally defensive in nature, they will be amongst the first to feel the heat of tariffs. As such, we have also decided to remove the category to focus on ideas that we have greater conviction on.
Related articles:
Stagflation and recession: A double threat looms over the US economy
Why the Digital Economy sector still warrants a spot in your portfolio
Strong Q1 Results Don’t Shield US Banks from Trump’s Tariff Risks
Added China Tech and China Electric Vehicles into “Tactical Plays” category
Last year, we removed China-related tactical plays due to our bearish outlook on the country, driven by its ongoing property crisis, top-down state intervention in the economy that had stifled growth and undermined business confidence, as well as escalating geopolitical tensions with the US.
However, the landscape has shifted meaningfully since then. China’s economy is showing signs of recovery, supported by sweeping stimulus measures aimed at stabilising the property sector and steering the country toward a consumption-led growth model. At the same time, China's trade diversification efforts have better positioned it to weather potential disruptions from a renewed Trump presidency.
Moreover, the emergence of DeepSeek’s breakthrough AI model—alongside the government’s renewed support for private enterprise—has helped restore investor confidence in China’s technology sector. Most Chinese tech firms are well-positioned, benefiting from limited reliance on global markets and strong domestic earnings growth fueled by consumption-driven policies and rapid AI advancements.
To capitalise on the rebound in Chinese tech, we recommend the iShares Hang Seng Tech ETF (HKEX:3067). Its top holdings—such as Alibaba, Tencent, and SMIC—are relatively insulated from US tariffs and exclude more vulnerable, US-reliant names like PDD.
Investors who prefer investing using their Supplementary Retirement Scheme (SRS) can consider the Lion-OCBC Securities Hang Seng TECH ETF (SGX:HST) instead.
Related articles:
Added Europe Defence into “Tactical Plays” category
Trump’s ‘America First’ agenda extends beyond trade. The US president has also adopted a more transactional approach to transatlantic security, threatening to withhold defence support to NATO allies that fail to increase their military spending. He has accused Europe of free-riding on American defence and has demanded that NATO members raise their defence spending target from 2% to 5% of GDP. This, coupled with the US’ reduced support for Ukraine in its ongoing war with Russia, has prompted Europe to reconsider its reliance on the US.
In a bid to strengthen military autonomy and respond to mounting pressure from President Trump for Europe to shoulder more of its own defense, the European Union unveiled the ReArm Europe plan (as known as Readiness 2030) in March 2025, a four-year €800 billion fiscal stimulus aimed at boosting European defense spending. To facilitate this, the EU intends to activate an “escape clause” in its budgetary rules, allowing member states to boost defense investments without facing penalties for breaching fiscal limits. Germany, long known for its reluctance to take on debt, has also relaxed its national fiscal rule — the “debt brake” — to permit defense spending exceeding 1% of GDP to be financed through new borrowing.
European defense companies stand to be key beneficiaries of this shift. As the EU ramps up military spending to reduce its dependence on US support, these firms are poised to benefit from accelerated procurement cycles and expanding order backlogs. This builds on an already strong growth momentum driven by heightened demand following the Russia-Ukraine war. If current budget commitments are sustained and planned expansions proceed as expected, we anticipate robust double-digit earnings growth across the sector over the next three years.
For investors looking to capitalise on this structural pivot toward European defense autonomy, we recommend the WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS ETF (LSE:WDEF).
Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF (LSE:XCS5) – Our new India ETF
While we have traditionally preferred physical ETFs to avoid the counterparty risk inherent in swap-based structures, we believe swap ETFs offer distinct advantages in the context of the Indian market.
For physical India ETFs, the underlying stocks are subject to capital gain tax (CGT) when shares are redeemed by Authorised Participants and the ETF issuer sells the underlying stocks. CGT is also incurred when Indian stocks are sold during portfolio rebalancing to track the index. Short-term capital gains (from stocks held for 12 months or less) are taxed at 20%, while long-term capital gains (from stocks held for more than 12 months) are taxed at 12.5%. Since the amount of CGT depends on both the size of the gains and the holding period, investors of physical India ETFs face an uncertain tax burden, which can lead to significant underperformance relative to the index when India markets rally strongly.
To avoid this uncertainty, investors can consider a swap-based ETF like the Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF (LSE:XCS5). Unlike physical ETFs, XCS5 does not hold the underlying Indian securities. Instead, it enters into swap agreements with counterparties that deliver the full return of the MSCI India Index —including dividends—in exchange for a fixed swap fee. This fee is transparent, providing a level of cost certainty not possible with physical India ETFs. For XCS5, the swap fee has been reduced to 57 basis points (bps) for the April 2025–April 2026 period, down from 89bps the year before.
Additionally, XCS5 also features a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.19%, compared to 0.65% for the iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF (LSE: NDIA), which we previously recommended.
For these reasons, we are changing our recommended ETF for India from NDIA to XCS5.
Understandably, investors may be concerned about counterparty risk—the possibility that the counterparties to the swap agreements could default on their obligations. This is mitigated through XCS5’s engagement with multiple high-quality counterparties, including Barclays, Société Générale, BNP Paribas, and Goldman Sachs. Moreover, the swaps are marked to market daily, and collateral is posted to fully offset any potential losses. This mechanism, mandated by the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), ensures that net counterparty exposure is effectively reduced to zero.
Nonetheless, for investors who remain uncomfortable with counterparty risk, NDIA remains a solid alternative.
Related article: Looking to save on withholding taxes? Here’s how you can do it with ETFs.
iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (LSE:DLTM) – Our new Latin America ETF
We are changing our recommended ETF for Latin America from iShares Latin America 40 ETF (NYSE:ILF) to iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (LSE:DLTM). This change is driven by DLTM’s lower expense ratio of 0.20% compared to ILF’s 0.48%, with the former having a slightly better tracking difference as well.
Furthermore, as an Irish-domiciled ETF, DLTM is only subject to 15% withholding tax on dividends whereas ILF is subject to 30% as it is domiciled in the US. Withholding tax savings is particularly important for Latin America ETFs as they generally tend to pay out high dividends of around 5-6%. In fact, the trailing 12-month dividend yield of DLTM rose from 4.56% in end April 2024 to a one year high of 5.79% on 3 January 2025.
It is worth noting that ILF and DLTM track different indexes. ILF tracks the S&P Latin America 40 Index, which comprises 40 of the largest Latin American equities across Brazil, Chile, Columbia, Mexico, and Peru. In contrast, DLTM tracks the MSCI EM Latin America 10/40 Index, offering exposure to both large- and mid-cap companies across the same countries. Despite these differences, both ETFs are highly similar in terms of geographic and sector allocations.
Table 2: Key differences between iShares Latin America 40 ETF and iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF
|
2024 |
2025 |
|
|
Recommended ETF |
iShares Latin America 40 ETF (NYSE: ILF) |
|
|
Underlying Index |
S&P Latin America 40 Index |
MSCI EM Latin America 10/40 Index |
|
Number of constituents |
43 |
86 |
|
Assets under management (USD Millions) |
1,568 |
510 |
|
Trading currency |
USD |
USD |
|
Expense ratio |
0.48% |
0.20% |
|
Dividend withholding tax for Singapore investors |
30% |
15% |
|
Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P., iFAST Compilations Data as of 30 April 2025 |
||
Other key changes to the list
Removals
We have removed Brazil, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam from Single Market due to limited investor interest. However, those still seeking exposure can consider regional ETFs such as the iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (LSE:DLTM) for Brazil and the Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (NYSE:ASEA) for Indonesia and Thailand.
Additions
Under Core Equity (US), we have added the SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (LSE:SPYL) as an additional option for investors seeking S&P 500 exposure on the London Stock Exchange.
Alongside our existing REIT recommendation—the NikkoAM-StraitsTrading Asia ex Japan REIT ETF (SGX:CFA)—we are also recommending the Lion-Phillip S-REIT ETF (SGX:CLR) for investors who prefer more targeted exposure to Singapore REITs over broader regional REITs. Like CFA, CLR is also eligible for Supplementary Retirement Scheme (SRS) investments.
Changes
Under Regional Equity, we have renamed “Emerging South East Asia” to “South East Asia” to offer a more inclusive representation of the region. Our previous recommendation for EM SEA - the Premia Dow Jones EM ASEAN Titans 100 ETF (HKEX:9810) does not have exposure to Singapore, which is one of our new Asian Tigers. On top of that, 9810 continues to struggle with low liquidity despite having been incepted nearly seven years ago (Table 3).
For these reasons we have decided to replace it with the Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (NYSE:ASEA), despite its higher expense ratio.
Table 3: Comparison between 9810 and ASEA
|
2024 |
2025 |
|
|
Recommended ETF |
Premia Dow Jones Em ASEAN Titans 100 ETF (HKEX:9810) |
|
|
Assets under management (USD Millions) |
34 |
61 |
|
Expense ratio |
0.50% |
0.65% |
|
Geographical breakdown |
Malaysia (26.1%) Thailand (24.7%) Indonesia (23.9%) Philippines (20.1%) Vietnam (5.3%) |
Singapore (44.0%) Thailand (18.8%) Indonesia (17.4%) Malaysia (15.8%) Philippines (4.0%) |
|
Average 90-day trading volume |
2,509 |
37,303 |
|
Bid-ask spread |
0.77% |
0.65% |
|
3 Year tracking difference |
-2.66% |
-1.56% |
|
Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P. Data as of 30 April 2025. |
||
For Fixed Income, we have merged the US and Global categories to reflect the fact that global fixed income funds typically have significant US exposure. As such, we have removed the SPDR Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (LSE:USAG) from our focus list, while retaining the iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LSE:AGGG) under the newly named “Global Investment Grade” category.
For the same reason, we have also renamed “US High Yield” to “Global High Yield”, with no change to our recommended ETF for the category.
Table 4: Summary of changes to the 2025 ETF Focus List
|
2024 |
2025 |
|
|
Core Equity |
||
|
US |
- |
|
|
US Value |
Vanguard Value ETF (NYSE:VTV) |
- |
|
Fixed Income |
||
|
Global Investment Grade |
SPDR Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (LSE: USAG) |
Category merged with “Global”. Recommended ETF removed |
|
Global High Yield |
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LSE:HYUS) |
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LSE:HYUS) |
|
Regional Equity |
||
|
South East Asia |
Premia Dow Jones Em ASEAN Titans 100 ETF (HKEX:9810) |
|
|
Latin America |
iShares Latin America 40 ETF (NYSE:ILF) |
|
|
Single Market |
||
|
India |
iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF (LSE:NDIA) |
|
|
Brazil |
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (NYSE:EWZ) |
- |
|
Indonesia |
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (NYSE:EIDO) |
- |
|
Thailand |
iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (NYSE:THD) |
- |
|
Vietnam |
VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (BATS:VNM) |
- |
|
Tactical Plays |
||
|
China Electric Vehicles |
- |
|
|
China Tech |
- |
|
|
China Tech |
- |
|
|
Europe Defence |
- |
|
|
REIT |
- |
|
|
US Banks |
Invesco KBW Bank ETF (NASDAQ:KBWB) |
- |
|
US Consumer Staples |
Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (NYSE:XLP) |
- |
A starting point for your investment journey
The objective of our ETF Focus List is to serve as a starting point for investors by zeroing in on the best-in-class ETFs from the vast number of options available on our platform.
While ETFs are not the only investment products that investors can select for their portfolios, they still serve as great investment tools for gaining diversified exposure to markets at a low cost.
As for the ETFs which have been removed or replaced, investors who are holding on to them should not be worried as they remain viable investment options. They will also continue to be available under the Regular Savings Plan (RSP), along with the new additions.
Declaration:
For specific disclosure, at the time of publication of this report, IFPL (via its connected and associated entities) and the analyst who produced this report hold a NIL position in the abovementioned securities.
