DBS, UOB or OCBC: Which Singapore Bank Should You Pick for Your Investment Portfolio?

We compare the three banks after they released their latest earnings to see which makes the best pick for your portfolio.

The Smart Investor
The Smart Investor13 Aug 2024 6229 Views
DBS, UOB or OCBC: Which Singapore Bank Should You Pick for Your Investment Portfolio?

The local banks are in the spotlight as the US Central Bank hinted that it may proceed with an interest rate cut this September.

This earnings season has seen DBS Group (SGX: D05), United Overseas Bank (SGX: U11), or UOB, and OCBC Ltd (SGX: O39) releasing strong sets of earnings as high interest rates buoy their net interest income.

Investors may be wondering which of these blue-chip banks stand the best chance of doing well should interest rates fall.

Let’s go through several attributes to compare the trio and arrive at a conclusion as to which makes the most compelling choice for your portfolio.

Financial performance

Source: DBS, UOB and OCBC Earnings Reports

With all three banks having reported their second quarter of 2024 (2Q 2024) earnings, we compare how each bank did for total income, profit before allowances, and net profit.

It was a mixed result as DBS logged the best year-on-year increase in total income with an 8.7% rise.

OCBC came in second with a 5% year-on-year increase in total income to S$3.6 billion for the quarter.

Looking at the profit before allowances, both DBS and OCBC were neck and neck with a 6%+ year-on-year increase.

OCBC came out tops when it came to net profit as the lender saw a 43% year-on-year decline in allowances.

DBS, on the other hand, recorded a general provision of S$51 million for 2Q 2024 compared to a write-back of provisions of S$42 million in the prior year.

As a result, OCBC chalked up an impressive 13.7% year-on-year increase in net profit to S$1.9 billion.

Winner: OCBC

Net interest margins and loan growth

Source: DBS, UOB and OCBC Earnings Reports

Next, we move on to each bank’s net interest margin (NIM) and scrutinise the loan book.

UOB tops the list with a year-on-year increase of 2.7% for its loan book.

However, UOB has the lowest NIM of the three banks at 2.05% for 2Q 2024.

OCBC is the winner when it comes to NIM as it boasts the highest NIM for not just 2Q 2024, but also 2Q 2023 and the previous quarter (1Q 2024).

However, investors should note that DBS saw the gentlest year-on-year decline in its NIM of just 0.02 percentage points compared with its peers.

Winner: OCBC

Cost-to-income ratio (CIR)

Source: DBS, UOB and OCBC Earnings Reports

The next attribute we are comparing is each bank’s cost-to-income ratio or CIR.

A lower CIR implies that the bank is more efficient at running its business as its expenses are a lower proportion of its total income.

Again, OCBC is the winner with a CIR of just 37.8% for 2Q 2024. OCBC continued to maintain a low CIR quarter-on-quarter with CIR rising by just 0.07 percentage points.

Although DBS had a fairly low CIR in 1Q 2024, Singapore’s largest bank saw its CIR jump by 2.2 percentage points to 39.6% in the current quarter.

Winner: OCBC

Non-performing loans (NPL) ratio

Source: DBS, UOB and OCBC Earnings Reports

We move on to the non-performing loans (NPL) ratio next.

OCBC has not only the lowest NPL ratio of the three banks at 0.9% but also saw a year-on-year improvement of 0.2 percentage points, making it the clear winner.

Winner: OCBC

Dividend yield

Source: DBS, UOB and OCBC Earnings Reports

This next attribute, dividend yield, should be a favourite with income investors.

With all three banks declaring a dividend for the first half of 2024, we compared each lender’s trailing 12-month dividend yield.

Both DBS and OCBC are tied for this attribute with a 6% trailing dividend yield.

However, investors should note that DBS pays out a quarterly dividend compared to half-yearly for the other two banks.

At the current rate of S$0.54 per share, the annualised dividend for DBS is S$2.16, which gives the bank a forward dividend yield of 6.4%.

Winner: DBS

Valuation

Source: DBS, UOB and OCBC Earnings Reports

Finally, we look at each bank’s valuation to determine which offers the most value.

UOB has the lowest valuation of the three banks with OCBC coming in at a close second, based on each bank’s latest price-to-book ratio.

DBS is the most expensive of the trio with a price-to-book ratio of more than 1.5 times.

Winner: UOB

Get Smart: OCBC wins hands down

OCBC wins by ticking off most of the attributes listed here.

Not only did the lender chalk up the best year-on-year profit increase, but it also boasted the highest NIM and the lowest CIR.

Investors can also enjoy a 6% trailing dividend yield if they purchase shares of OCBC and its valuation remains undemanding at just 1.16 times price-to-book.

However, income investors who prefer to receive quarterly dividends should look favourably on DBS as it is the only bank out of the three to pay dividends every three months.

If you’re looking to buy the next S$100 billion stock in SGX, pay attention to our newest FREE report. We dug deep and uncovered which SGX companies have the potential for massive growth. Even if the numbers look great, things aren’t always what they seem. We let the numbers tell us the full story. Download for free now!

Disclosure: Royston Yang owns shares of DBS Group.

All materials and contents found in this site are strictly for general circulation and informational purposes only and should not be considered as an offer, or solicitation, to deal in any of the funds or products found/identified in this site. While iFAST Financial Pte Ltd ("IFPL") has tried to provide accurate and timely information, there may be inadvertent delays, omissions, technical or factual inaccuracies and typographical errors. Any opinion or estimate contained in this report is made on a general basis and neither IFPL nor any of its servants or agents have given any consideration to nor have they or any of them made any investigation of the investment objective, financial situation or particular need of any user or reader, any specific person or group of persons. You should consider carefully if the products you are going to purchase are suitable for your investment objective, investment experience, risk tolerance and other personal circumstances. If you are uncertain about the suitability of the investment product, please seek advice from a financial adviser, before making a decision to purchase the investment product. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The value of the investment products and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. In respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with the said research analyses or research reports, recipients of the report are to contact IFPL at 10 Collyer Quay, #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Building, Singapore 049315, or by telephone at +65 6557 2853. Where the report contains research analyses or research reports from a foreign research house and if the recipient of such research analyses or research reports is not an accredited investor, expert investor, institutional investor or an ex-accredited investor, IFPL accepts legal responsibility for the contents of such analyses or reports to such persons only to the extent as required by law. Please note that only certain security(ies) herein are available to all investors, while the rest are only available for certain persons to invest in, such as Accredited Investors (as defined in the Securities and Futures Act) or one who invests at least S$200,000 (or its equivalent currency) per transaction. To qualify as an Accredited Investor, one needs to submit a declaration form and certain relevant supporting documents, according to iFAST’s prevailing policies and procedures.

Please read our full disclaimers on the website at ( https://secure.fundsupermart.com/fsmone/policies/328125/investment-account-terms-&-conditions).

iFAST Financial Pte Ltd (IFPL) (registered address: 10 Collyer Quay #26-01 Ocean Financial Centre Singapore 049315, Telephone: 6557 2000) holds the Financial Advisers Licence issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore ('MAS') to conduct regulated activities of advising on securities, marketing of collective investment schemes and arranging of any contract of insurance in respect of life policies, other than a contract of reinsurance and the Capital Markets Services Licence issued by the MAS to conduct regulated activities of dealing in securities and providing custodial services for securities. While IFPL has made every effort to ensure the independence of the report's contents, IFPL's nature of business is such that IFPL and its connected and associated entities together with their respective directors, officers and staff may be involved in providing dealing or investment-related services in the abovementioned securities, and have taken or may take positions in the securities mentioned in this report, and may also act as the principal for any buy or sell trades.