
When most investors think about “China Tech”, the immediate association is often with familiar internet platforms and consumer-facing applications such as Tencent’s WeChat, Alibaba’s Taobao, or Meituan’s food delivery ecosystem.
These companies are grouped under the Hang Seng TECH Index, representing the world of internet platforms, e-commerce, social media, and digital services, commonly referred to as “Soft Tech”.
However, beneath these consumer applications lies another critical layer of the technology ecosystem. None of these digital services can function without the underlying infrastructure powering them. There is a vast industry involved in manufacturing semiconductor chips used in smartphones, EV batteries powering electric vehicles, AI chips operating inside large-scale data centres, as well as robotics, biotechnology, and industrial automation systems driving China’s next phase of technological development. This ecosystem is commonly referred to as “Hard Tech”.
While soft tech focuses on scalable digital solutions and user experience, hard tech creates the physical and tangible infrastructure underpinning the broader technology ecosystem.
This article explores the distinctions between China’s hard tech and soft tech ecosystems, and how investors may potentially use the STAR and ChiNext markets to gain broader exposure across China’s full technology landscape.
The Two Tech Ecosystems
While global attention has largely focused on regulatory developments surrounding China’s internet giants, Mainland China’s capital markets, particularly the STAR Market on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the ChiNext Market on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, have quietly nurtured a growing ecosystem of deep-tech companies.
This forms the foundation of China’s “two tech ecosystems”.
The first ecosystem is represented by the Hang Seng TECH Index based in Hong Kong. This ecosystem consists primarily of platform companies. Historically, many of China’s largest technology firms chose to list in Hong Kong due to easier access to international capital and global investors.
These businesses are generally asset-light. Rather than manufacturing physical products or hardware, they focus on building digital ecosystems. Take for example, an app. It carries no physical form, yet it can connect millions of users, merchants, and advertisers on a single platform. This is the essence of the platform economy.
The second ecosystem is based in Mainland China. In 2019, China launched the STAR Market in Shanghai, officially known as the Science and Technology Innovation Board. It is often described as the “Nasdaq of China”.
The STAR Market has stringent listing requirements. Companies must operate within strategic industries such as semiconductors, advanced manufacturing, or industrial automation. The market was designed specifically to provide hard tech companies with access to capital needed for innovation in industries regarded as strategically important to China’s long-term competitiveness.
Alongside the STAR Market is the ChiNext Board in Shenzhen, which was established in 2009. The ChiNext Board focuses on high-growth and innovative private enterprises. While broader in scope than the STAR Market, it remains heavily concentrated in technology and health-tech sectors.
Together, these ecosystems form the CSI STAR and ChiNext 50 Index, which provides exposure to 50 of the largest and most liquid companies listed across both innovation-driven boards.
Why Investors Should Not Ignore Hard Tech
The growing relevance of China’s hard tech ecosystem is closely tied to national strategy.
China’s “15th Five-Year Plan (2026–2030)” places significant emphasis on achieving “Self-Reliance in Science and Technology”. Key policy priorities include Artificial Intelligence (人工智能), High-Quality Development (高质量发展), Scientific and Technological Innovation (科技创新), and National Security (国家安全).
In China, when the government commits strongly to a strategic direction, substantial resources often follow. In Chinese, the concept is referred to as “决意”, reflecting a situation where the state has decisively committed itself to a sector, resulting in aggressive capital allocation and policy support.
Funding, infrastructure development, regulatory support, supply chain coordination, and consumer adoption can all accelerate simultaneously once national priorities are aligned.
This dynamic is often described through the Chinese saying:
“风口来了,猪都会飞。”
Translated loosely, it suggests that when powerful policy support and macro momentum converge, entire industries can experience rapid growth regardless of individual capabilities.
As a result, markets can become heavily influenced by policy momentum, with investors seeking early positioning in sectors likely to benefit from long-term strategic support.

Top policy terms mentioned in the past Five-Year Plans
China’s broader objective is to reduce dependence on foreign technology in critical areas such as semiconductors, artificial intelligence, industrial software, robotics, and advanced manufacturing. Geopolitical tensions and supply chain vulnerabilities over recent years have further reinforced the importance of technological self-sufficiency.
While the companies within the Hang Seng TECH Index continue to benefit from domestic consumption and the digital economy, the STAR and ChiNext ecosystems focus on companies building China’s technological infrastructure. These include semiconductor manufacturers, AI computing infrastructure providers, EV supply chain players, and industrial automation companies.
For investors seeking to understand where long-term policy tailwinds may potentially emerge, analysing only internet platforms may provide an incomplete picture. The hardware and infrastructure powering future technologies may be equally important.
These observations also align with insights gathered during The Joyful Investors’ recent study trip to Beijing, which focused on developments in robotics and artificial intelligence.
What Is Inside the CSI STAR and ChiNext 50 Index?
One challenge for global investors is that many Mainland China hard tech companies are relatively unfamiliar compared to globally recognised internet giants such as Alibaba or Tencent.
Examining the holdings within the CSI STAR and ChiNext 50 Index provides clearer insight into where China’s next wave of technological growth may potentially originate.

As of 19 May 2026, the largest holding in the index is Zhongji Innolight, representing 14.6% of the index weight.
Zhongji Innolight manufactures optical transceivers, devices that convert electrical signals into light signals for ultra-fast data transmission through fibre optic cables within data centres. These components are essential for enabling communication between thousands of GPUs inside AI data centres.
The company is currently the world’s largest optical transceiver manufacturer for AI data centres and serves as a core optics supplier to NVIDIA. As AI data centre spending by global hyperscalers continues expanding, Zhongji Innolight benefits directly from this trend.
Its closest US equivalent is Coherent Corp.
The second-largest holding is Eoptolink with approximately 10.0% weighting. Like Zhongji Innolight, Eoptolink specialises in optical transceivers and is another beneficiary of the AI data centre expansion cycle.
Combined, Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink account for roughly 24.6% of the index weight and are directly linked to AI infrastructure connectivity.
The third-largest holding is CATL.
While investors may be increasingly familiar with electric vehicle brands such as Tesla and BYD, CATL remains one of the most important players in the EV supply chain.
CATL is currently the world’s largest EV battery manufacturer, with close to 39% global market share according to SNE Research. Its batteries are used across major global automotive brands including Tesla, BMW, and Volkswagen. To date, CATL batteries have been installed in more than 24 million vehicles worldwide.
For fiscal year 2025, revenue grew 17% year-on-year while net profit increased more than 42% year-on-year.
Beyond EV batteries, CATL is also expanding into grid-scale energy storage solutions, sodium-ion battery technology, and battery-as-a-service business models.
Another major holding is Cambricon Technologies.
China has been actively pushing to develop its own domestic AI chip ecosystem, making the development of alternatives to NVIDIA strategically important. The two most prominent names in this space are Huawei and Cambricon. Since Huawei is not publicly listed, Cambricon has become one of the few pure-play listed companies providing direct exposure to China’s domestic AI chip ambitions.
Cambricon designs AI chips, specifically neural processing units and AI accelerators used in data centres, edge computing, and intelligent terminals. Its Siyuan chip series competes directly with NVIDIA’s GPU offerings for AI training and inference workloads.
After years of significant R&D spending and operating losses, Cambricon achieved a major turning point by reaching profitability in late 2024. By full-year 2025, the company reported its first annual net profit since its founding in 2016, exceeding RMB 2 billion.
Even after recent developments allowing limited sales of certain NVIDIA H200 chips to Chinese firms following the Trump-Xi 2026 Summit, Chinese companies continue prioritising domestic AI chip development. This shift is no longer solely about performance, but also about achieving technological self-sufficiency.
The fifth-largest component is Hygon Information Technology.
Hygon produces high-performance processors and AI accelerator chips for data centres. Originally based on CPU architecture developed from licensed AMD technology, the company has increasingly pivoted towards GPU-like accelerators under its DCU brand. These accelerators support CUDA-like workflows, allowing developers within the NVIDIA ecosystem to migrate workloads more easily.
In response to US-China chip restrictions, Hygon’s DCU accelerators have emerged as one of the key domestically available alternatives for Chinese cloud providers and AI data centres seeking to reduce reliance on NVIDIA.
Another strategically important company is SMIC, often described as the “TSMC of China”.
SMIC manufactures semiconductor chips designed by other companies, similar to the role played by TSMC. It is widely regarded as one of the most strategically critical companies within China’s semiconductor self-sufficiency ambitions, manufacturing chips for companies such as Cambricon, Hygon, and Huawei.
The index also includes companies such as Advanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment (AMEC), which manufactures semiconductor fabrication equipment including plasma etching and deposition tools used in chip production. It is often seen as China’s equivalent of Lam Research.
CSI STAR and ChiNext 50 Index vs Hang Seng TECH Index
When comparing the CSI STAR and ChiNext 50 Index alongside the Hang Seng TECH Index, the distinction between the two ecosystems becomes increasingly clear.
One ecosystem focuses on building the digital platforms consumers interact with daily. The other focuses on constructing the physical infrastructure and hardware supporting the broader technological ecosystem.
There is only one major overlap between both indices: SMIC, reflecting its uniquely strategic position within China’s technology landscape.

How Investors Can Access the CSI STAR and ChiNext 50 Index
For investors seeking exposure to China’s hard tech ecosystem, one accessible route is through the CSOP CSI STAR & CHINEXT 50 ETF listed on the Singapore Exchange under the ticker SCY.
The ETF is denominated in Singapore dollars, allowing Singapore-based investors to avoid additional foreign exchange conversion fees.
Launched in December 2022, the ETF tracks the CSI STAR and ChiNext 50 Index and provides exposure to 50 of the largest and most liquid companies listed across both the STAR Market and ChiNext Board.
Source: CSOP Asset Management
Structurally, the ETF operates as a feeder fund, investing into an underlying ETF listed in Shenzhen. This structure enables Singapore investors to access Mainland China companies that may otherwise be difficult to invest in directly. From a practical standpoint, however, investors can purchase the ETF on the SGX using a regular brokerage account in the same manner as other Singapore-listed stocks or ETFs.
SCY ETF Price Chart (Source: TradingView)

SCY Fund Performance (Source: CSOP Asset Management)
How It Fits Into Portfolio Construction
From a portfolio construction perspective, hard tech and soft tech do not necessarily need to be viewed as mutually exclusive exposures. Instead, they may represent complementary segments within China’s broader technology ecosystem.
One advantage is diversification. The overlap between the Hang Seng TECH Index and the CSI STAR and ChiNext 50 Index is relatively limited, potentially providing broader exposure across different technology-related industries.
Over the past few years, the performance differences between the Hang Seng TECH Index and the CSI STAR and ChiNext 50 Index also highlight how both ecosystems can behave differently across various market environments.
- YTD Performance (as of 22 May 2026)
- Hang Seng TECH Index: -12%
- CSI STAR & ChiNext 50 Index: +33%
- 1Y Performance (as of 22 May 2026)
- Hang Seng TECH Index: -7%
- CSI STAR & ChiNext 50 Index: +128%
- 3Y Performance (as of 22 May 2026)
- Hang Seng TECH Index: +32%
- CSI STAR & ChiNext 50 Index: +118%
This divergence further reinforces the diversification benefits of combining exposure to both consumer internet platforms and deep-tech infrastructure within a broader China technology allocation.
Another important consideration is policy support. China’s government continues prioritising semiconductor self-sufficiency, AI chip development, and clean energy manufacturing, areas where many SCY holdings are directly positioned.
The risk profiles of the two ecosystems can also differ substantially. The HSTECH ecosystem is generally more sensitive to consumer spending trends, internet platform sentiment, and global growth-tech positioning. In contrast, the STAR and ChiNext ecosystem is more closely tied to China’s domestic industrial policy and may therefore behave differently across various macroeconomic environments.
Potential Risks Involved
Despite the strong long-term growth narrative surrounding hard tech and AI infrastructure, investors should also understand the associated risks.
One key consideration is concentration risk.
A large proportion of the top holdings within the CSI STAR and ChiNext 50 Index are directly or indirectly linked to AI infrastructure, semiconductors, and data centres. This means any significant deterioration in market sentiment surrounding AI capital expenditure could impact many holdings simultaneously.
For example, if global hyperscalers significantly reduce AI data centre spending, or if markets begin questioning AI monetisation potential and sector valuations, these companies could face substantial pressure concurrently.
Investors should therefore continue evaluating portfolio diversification at the overall portfolio level.
A portfolio may appear geographically diversified if it contains:
- Singapore-listed semiconductor-related companies
- US AI exposure through companies such as NVIDIA
- China AI infrastructure exposure
However, such a portfolio may still be heavily concentrated around a single global AI and semiconductor cycle.
As a result, while the long-term opportunities may appear compelling, position sizing and broader diversification remain critically important considerations.
Closing Thoughts
In increasingly volatile markets, diversification continues to play an important role in portfolio construction.
Different parts of China’s technology ecosystem may perform differently under varying macroeconomic conditions. As such, exposure across both consumer internet platforms and deep-tech infrastructure may potentially help investors build a more balanced technology portfolio.
